Literature DB >> 21264605

Contribution of strategy use to performance on complex and simple span tasks.

Heather Bailey1, John Dunlosky, Michael J Kane.   

Abstract

Simple and complex span tasks are widely thought to measure related but separable memory constructs. Recently, however, research has demonstrated that simple and complex span tasks may tap, in part, the same construct because both similarly predict performance on measures of fluid intelligence (Gf) when the number of items retrieved from secondary memory (SM) is equated (Unsworth & Engle, Journal of Memory and Language 54:68-80 2006). Two studies (n = 105 and n = 152) evaluated whether retrieval from SM is influenced by individual differences in the use of encoding strategies during span tasks. Results demonstrated that, after equating the number of items retrieved from SM, simple and complex span performance similarly predicted Gf performance, but rates of effective strategy use did not mediate the span-Gf relationships. Moreover, at the level of individual differences, effective strategy use was more highly related to complex span performance than to simple span performance. Thus, even though individual differences in effective strategy use influenced span performance on trials that required retrieval from SM, strategic behavior at encoding cannot account for the similarities between simple and complex span tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264605     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0034-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  33 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.

Authors:  R W Engle; J Cantor; J J Carullo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: the contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Gregory J Spillers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

4.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Strategy use in the reading span test: an analysis of eye movements and reported encoding strategies.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2007-08

Review 6.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

7.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach.

Authors:  P Shah; A Miyake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-03

8.  Group aggregates and individual reliability: the case of verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  R H Logie; S Della Sala; M Laiacona; P Chalmers; V Wynn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-05

9.  Simultaneous acoustic and semantic coding in short-term memory.

Authors:  A D Baddeley; J R Ecob
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Acquisition of a memory skill.

Authors:  K A Ericcson; W G Chase; S Faloon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Dakota R B Lindsey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

3.  The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Michael Chow; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

4.  The effects of refreshing and elaboration on working memory performance, and their contributions to long-term memory formation.

Authors:  Lea M Bartsch; Henrik Singmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

5.  Does strategy training reduce age-related deficits in working memory?

Authors:  Heather R Bailey; John Dunlosky; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.140

6.  Variation in strategy use across measures of verbal working memory.

Authors:  Alexandra B Morrison; Gail M Rosenbaum; Damien Fair; Jason M Chein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

7.  The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jonathan S Jones; Fraser Milton; Mohammod Mostazir; Anna R Adlam
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-06-27

8.  No Evidence That Articulatory Rehearsal Improves Complex Span Performance.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2020-05-12

9.  Measuring individual differences in cognitive abilities in the lab and on the web.

Authors:  Simón Ruiz; Xiaobin Chen; Patrick Rebuschat; Detmar Meurers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.