Literature DB >> 17654278

Strategy use in the reading span test: an analysis of eye movements and reported encoding strategies.

Johanna K Kaakinen1, Jukka Hyönä.   

Abstract

Strategy use in the traditional reading span test was examined by recording participants' eye movements during the task (Experiment 1) and by interviewing participants about their strategy use (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, no differences between individuals with a low, medium, and high span were observed in how they distributed processing time between task elements. In all three groups, fixation times on words up to the to-be-remembered (TBR) word became shorter and the time spent on the TBR longer as memory load in the task increased. The results of Experiment 2, however, show that span groups differ in the use of memory encoding strategies: individuals with a low span use mainly rehearsal, whereas individuals with a high span use almost exclusively semantic elaboration. The results indicate that the use of elaborative strategies may enhance span performance but that not all individuals are necessarily able to use such strategies efficiently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17654278     DOI: 10.1080/09658210701457096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  9 in total

1.  Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory.

Authors:  Jenni L Schelble; David J Therriault; M David Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

3.  The influence of complex working memory span task administration methods on prediction of higher level cognition and metacognitive control of response times.

Authors:  David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

4.  Why does working memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis.

Authors:  Heather Bailey; John Dunlosky; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

5.  Contribution of strategy use to performance on complex and simple span tasks.

Authors:  Heather Bailey; John Dunlosky; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

6.  The effects of refreshing and elaboration on working memory performance, and their contributions to long-term memory formation.

Authors:  Lea M Bartsch; Henrik Singmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  Does differential strategy use account for age-related deficits in working-memory performance?

Authors:  Heather Bailey; John Dunlosky; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-03

8.  Are individual differences in reading speed related to extrafoveal visual acuity and crowding?

Authors:  Romy Frömer; Olaf Dimigen; Florian Niefind; Niels Krause; Reinhold Kliegl; Werner Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The early effects of external and internal strategies on working memory updating training.

Authors:  Matti Laine; Daniel Fellman; Otto Waris; Thomas J Nyman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.