BACKGROUND: Older adults typically perform worse on measures of working memory (WM) than do young adults; however, age-related differences in WM performance might be reduced if older adults use effective encoding strategies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current experiment was to evaluate WM performance after training individuals to use effective encoding strategies. METHODS: Participants in the training group (older adults: n = 39; young adults: n = 41) were taught about various verbal encoding strategies and their differential effectiveness and were trained to use interactive imagery and sentence generation on a list-learning task. Participants in the control group (older: n = 37; young: n = 38) completed an equally engaging filler task. All participants completed a pre- and post-training reading span task, which included self-reported strategy use, as well as two transfer tasks that differed in the affordance to use the trained strategies - a paired-associate recall task and the self-ordered pointing task. RESULTS: Both young and older adults were able to use the target strategies on the WM task and showed gains in WM performance after training. The age-related WM deficit was not greatly affected, however, and the training gains did not transfer to the other cognitive tasks. In fact, participants attempted to adapt the trained strategies for a paired-associate recall task, but the increased strategy use did not benefit their performance. CONCLUSIONS: Strategy training can boost WM performance, and its benefits appear to arise from strategy-specific effects and not from domain-general gains in cognitive ability.
BACKGROUND: Older adults typically perform worse on measures of working memory (WM) than do young adults; however, age-related differences in WM performance might be reduced if older adults use effective encoding strategies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current experiment was to evaluate WM performance after training individuals to use effective encoding strategies. METHODS:Participants in the training group (older adults: n = 39; young adults: n = 41) were taught about various verbal encoding strategies and their differential effectiveness and were trained to use interactive imagery and sentence generation on a list-learning task. Participants in the control group (older: n = 37; young: n = 38) completed an equally engaging filler task. All participants completed a pre- and post-training reading span task, which included self-reported strategy use, as well as two transfer tasks that differed in the affordance to use the trained strategies - a paired-associate recall task and the self-ordered pointing task. RESULTS: Both young and older adults were able to use the target strategies on the WM task and showed gains in WM performance after training. The age-related WM deficit was not greatly affected, however, and the training gains did not transfer to the other cognitive tasks. In fact, participants attempted to adapt the trained strategies for a paired-associate recall task, but the increased strategy use did not benefit their performance. CONCLUSIONS: Strategy training can boost WM performance, and its benefits appear to arise from strategy-specific effects and not from domain-general gains in cognitive ability.
Authors: Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle Journal: Psychon Bull Rev Date: 2005-10
Authors: Alden L Gross; Jeanine M Parisi; Adam P Spira; Alexandra M Kueider; Jean Y Ko; Jane S Saczynski; Quincy M Samus; George W Rebok Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Stephan Heinzel; Stefanie Schulte; Johanna Onken; Quynh-Lam Duong; Thomas G Riemer; Andreas Heinz; Norbert Kathmann; Michael A Rapp Journal: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn Date: 2013-05-02
Authors: Sara Bottiroli; John Dunlosky; Kate Guerini; Elena Cavallini; Christopher Hertzog Journal: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn Date: 2010-06-15
Authors: Martin Bellander; Anne Eschen; Martin Lövdén; Mike Martin; Lars Bäckman; Yvonne Brehmer Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Ann-Marie Glasø de Lange; Anne Cecilie Sjøli Bråthen; Darius A Rohani; Håkon Grydeland; Anders M Fjell; Kristine B Walhovd Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.038