Literature DB >> 21264598

Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.

David P McCabe1, Henry L Roediger, Jeffrey D Karpicke.   

Abstract

Dual-process theories of retrieval suggest that controlled and automatic processing contribute to memory performance. Free recall tests are often considered pure measures of recollection, assessing only the controlled process. We report two experiments demonstrating that automatic processes also influence free recall. Experiment 1 used inclusion and exclusion tasks to estimate recollection and automaticity in free recall, adopting a new variant of the process dissociation procedure. Dividing attention during study selectively reduced the recollection estimate but did not affect the automatic component. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1, and subjects additionally reported remember-know-guess judgments during recall in the inclusion condition. In the latter task, dividing attention during study reduced remember judgments for studied items, but know responses were unaffected. Results from both methods indicated that free recall is partly driven by automatic processes. Thus, we conclude that retrieval in free recall tests is not driven solely by conscious recollection (or remembering) but also by automatic influences of the same sort believed to drive priming on implicit memory tests. Sometimes items come to mind without volition in free recall.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264598     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-010-0040-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  50 in total

1.  Rates of forgetting in organic amnesia following temporal lobe, diencephalic, or frontal lobe lesions.

Authors:  M D Kopelman; N Stanhope
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; A J Parkin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

3.  The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2006

4.  The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Lisa Geraci
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

5.  Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

6.  Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; C Ramponi; A Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

7.  Invariance in automatic influences of memory: toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control.

Authors:  J M Jennings; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1993-06

9.  Recall and recognition in mild hypoxia: using covariance structural modeling to test competing theories of explicit memory.

Authors:  Joel R Quamme; Andrew P Yonelinas; Keith F Widaman; Neal E A Kroll; Mary J Sauvé
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Internally generated reactivation of single neurons in human hippocampus during free recall.

Authors:  Hagar Gelbard-Sagiv; Roy Mukamel; Michal Harel; Rafael Malach; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  15 in total

1.  Perirhinal cortex removal dissociates two memory systems in matching-to-sample performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Development of Dual-Retrieval Processes in Recall: Learning, Forgetting, and Reminiscence.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; C Aydin; V F Reyna
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.065

4.  Familiarity and conceptual implicit memory: Individual differences and neural correlates.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Wang; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.065

5.  When items 'pop into mind': variability in temporal-context reinstatement in free-recall.

Authors:  Talya Sadeh; Rani Moran; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

6.  Cold-pressor stress after learning enhances familiarity-based recognition memory in men.

Authors:  Andrew M McCullough; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Category cued recall evokes a generate-recognize retrieval process.

Authors:  R Reed Hunt; Rebekah E Smith; Jeffrey P Toth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Mark J Huff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-08-31

9.  Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: an examination of individual differences.

Authors:  Wei-chun Wang; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

10.  Rethinking Familiarity: Remember/Know Judgments in Free Recall.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; Travis M Seale-Carlisle; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.