Literature DB >> 26280355

Category cued recall evokes a generate-recognize retrieval process.

R Reed Hunt1, Rebekah E Smith1, Jeffrey P Toth2.   

Abstract

The experiments reported here were designed to replicate and extend McCabe, Roediger, and Karpicke's (2011) finding that retrieval in category cued recall involves both controlled and automatic processes. The extension entailed identifying whether distinctive encoding affected 1 or both of these 2 processes. The first experiment successfully replicated McCabe et al., but the second, which added a critical baseline condition, produced data inconsistent with a 2 independent process model of recall. The third experiment provided evidence that retrieval in category cued recall reflects a generate-recognize strategy, with the effect of distinctive processing being localized to recognition. Overall, the data suggest that category cued recall evokes a generate-recognize retrieval strategy and that the subprocesses underlying this strategy can be dissociated as a function of distinctive versus relational encoding processes. (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26280355      PMCID: PMC4757519          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  33 in total

1.  Evidence for a generate-recognize model of episodic influences on word-stem completion.

Authors:  G E Bodner; M E Masson; J I Caldwell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Fluency versus conscious recollection in the word completion performance of amnesic patients.

Authors:  L S Cermak; M Verfaellie; M Sweeney; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Levels of processing effects on implicit and explicit memory tasks: using question position to investigate the lexical-processing hypothesis.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; Sally Andrews
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2004

4.  How Does Distinctive Processing Reduce False Recall?

Authors:  R Reed Hunt; Rebekah E Smith; Kathryn R Dunlap
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Invariance in automatic influences of memory: toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.

Authors:  T Curran; D L Hintzman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.

Authors:  J P Toth; E M Reingold; L L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Memory for unattended events: remembering with and without awareness.

Authors:  E Eich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-03

Review 9.  The role of the human hippocampus in familiarity-based and recollection-based recognition memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Recall and recognition in mild hypoxia: using covariance structural modeling to test competing theories of explicit memory.

Authors:  Joel R Quamme; Andrew P Yonelinas; Keith F Widaman; Neal E A Kroll; Mary J Sauvé
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  4 in total

1.  Characterizing adult age differences in the initiation and organization of retrieval: A further investigation of retrieval dynamics in dual-list free recall.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Lauren L Richmond; Mark J Huff; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-11

2.  Category norms with a cross-sectional sample of adults in the United States: Consideration of cohort, age, and historical effects on semantic categories.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Taylor Curley; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

3.  Are age differences in recognition-based retrieval monitoring an epiphenomenon of age differences in memory?

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; Taylor Curley; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  A Remember/Know Examination of Free-recall Reveals Dissociative Roles of Item- and Context-Information over Time.

Authors:  Talya Sadeh; Rani Moran; Yonatan Stern; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.