Literature DB >> 17061694

The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.

Michelle L Meade1, Henry L Roediger.   

Abstract

The effect of an initial forced recall test on later recall and recognition tests was examined in younger and older adults. Subjects were presented with categorized word lists and given an initial test under standard cued recall instructions (with a warning against guessing) or forced recall instructions (that required guessing); subjects were later given a cued recall test for the original list items. In 2 experiments, initial forced recall resulted in higher levels of illusory memories on subsequent tests (relative to initial cued recall), especially for older adults. Older adults were more likely to say they remembered rather than knew that forced guesses had occurred in the original study episode. The effect persisted despite a strong warning against making errors in Experiment 2. When a source monitoring test was given, older adults had more difficulty than younger adults in identifying the source of items they had originally produced as guesses. If conditions encourage subjects to guess on a first memory test, they are likely to recollect these guesses as actual memories on later tests. This effect is exaggerated in older adults, probably because of their greater source monitoring difficulties. Both dual process and source monitoring theories provide insight into these findings.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17061694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  8 in total

1.  False working memories? Semantic distortion in a mere 4 seconds.

Authors:  Alexandra S Atkins; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

2.  Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

3.  Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

4.  Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Andrew J Aschenbrenner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

5.  The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; David A Balota; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Aging reduces veridical remembering but increases false remembering: neuropsychological test correlates of remember-know judgments.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Henry L Roediger; Mark A McDaniel; David A Balota
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Inadvertent plagiarism in young and older adults: the role of working memory capacity in reducing memory errors.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Anderson D Smith; Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

8.  Adaptive constructive processes and memory accuracy: consequences of counterfactual simulations in young and older adults.

Authors:  Kathy D Gerlach; David W Dornblaser; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2013-04-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.