Literature DB >> 21259233

Negative appendicectomy and perforation rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for suspected appendicitis.

U Güller1, L Rosella, J McCall, L E Brügger, D Candinas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use of imaging technologies including ultrasonography and computed tomography, rates of negative appendicectomy and perforated appendicitis remain high. This trend analysis examined whether rates of negative appendicectomy and perforated appendicitis have decreased over time, and sought to evaluate clinical predictors associated with negative appendicectomy and perforated appendicitis.
METHODS: This analysis was based on the prospective database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS). All patients aged 12 years and over undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy between 1995 and 2006 were included. Unadjusted and risk-adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 7964 patients underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy, of whom 7452 (93.6 per cent) had acute appendicitis and 512 (6.4 per cent) had a macroscopically normal appendix. Perforation occurred in 1230 (16.5 per cent) of those with appendicitis. In multivariable analysis, younger age (12-18 years), female sex, absence of local or generalized peritonitis and an early point during the study period were significant predictors of negative appendicectomy. For perforated appendicitis, significant predictors included age over 36 years, presence of localized or generalized peritonitis, and high American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. The rate of negative appendicectomy decreased from 12.7 per cent in 1995 to 2.8 per cent in 2006, there being a significant reduction in both unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses (P < 0.001 for trend). In adjusted analyses, the rate of perforated appendicitis did not increase significantly over time.
CONCLUSION: The rate of negative appendicectomy decreased over time, without an accompanying increase in perforated appendicitis. The risk of having a negative appendicectomy was highest in girls aged 12-18 years without local or generalized peritonitis during the early study period, whereas perforation was associated with age over 36 years, presence of localized or generalized peritonitis, and greater co-morbidity.
Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2011 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21259233     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  23 in total

1.  Histological characterization of appendectomy specimens with intraoperative appearance of vascular injection.

Authors:  Marty Zdichavsky; Hannes Gögele; Gregor Blank; Miriam Kraulich; Tobias Meile; Maximilian von Feilitzsch; Dörte Wichmann; Alfred Königsrainer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in childhood: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Valeria Chirico; Antonio Lacquaniti; Vincenzo Salpietro; Caterina Munafò; Maria Pia Calabrò; Michele Buemi; Teresa Arrigo; Carmelo Salpietro
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David Reed Flum
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013

4.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The morbidity of negative appendicectomy.

Authors:  M Lee; T Paavana; F Mazari; T R Wilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The role of high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1) in the management of suspected acute appendicitis: useful diagnostic biomarker or just another blind alley?

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Normal inflammatory markers in appendicitis: evidence from two independent cohort studies.

Authors:  P G Vaughan-Shaw; J R Rees; E Bell; M Hamdan; T Platt
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-05-25

8.  Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score in Comparison to Alvarado Score in Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Toney Jose; P S Rajesh
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2021-07-19

9.  Evaluation of high mobility group box 1 protein as a presurgical diagnostic marker reflecting the severity of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Chuanxin Wu; Hang Sun; Hongliang Wang; Junmeng Chi; Qi Liu; Hui Guo; Jianping Gong
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Computerized tomography scan in acute appendicitis with eventual negative appendectomy.

Authors:  Ming Li Chia; Kwan Justin; Hui Terrence Chi Hong; G Shelat Vishal
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.