Literature DB >> 17197317

The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: an in vitro model with medullary bleeding.

Mark A Miller1, Amos Race, Sameer Gupta, Paul Higham, Michael T Clarke, Kenneth A Mann.   

Abstract

We compared the mechanical and morphological characteristics of cement-bone structures created with either standard- or low-viscosity cement using a human cadaver model that simulated intramedullary bleeding. The goal is to determine if the viscosity of the cement would affect the strength of the cement-bone interface and the degree of apposition between the cement and bone. The tensile strength of cement-bone constructs with standard-viscosity cement (2.42 +/- 1.55 MPa) was 21% stronger than with low-viscosity cement (2.00 +/- 1.51 MPa, P = .034). Cement-bone apposition was positively correlated (r2 = 0.29, P <. 0001) with the strength of the interface. There was 15% greater apposition between cement and bone (P = .036) for standard-viscosity cement. Low-viscosity cement may be less effective in displacing bone marrow and in preventing hemodynamic backflow, resulting in less apposition and a weaker interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17197317     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  A wax barrier to simulate bone resorption for pre-clinical laboratory models of cemented total hip replacements.

Authors:  Anjuli R Cherukuri; Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Timothy H Izant; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Richard J Cleary; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.

Authors:  Stephen Hunt; Craig Stone; Shane Seal
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell seeding on calcium phosphate cement-chitosan-RGD scaffold for bone repair.

Authors:  Wenchuan Chen; Hongzhi Zhou; Michael D Weir; Minghui Tang; Chongyun Bao; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Micromechanics of postmortem-retrieved cement-bone interfaces.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Alan W Eberhardt; Richard J Cleary; Nico Verdonschot; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  The effect of tourniquet usage on cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study of 3 methods.

Authors:  Okan Ozkunt; Kerim Sariyilmaz; Halil Can Gemalmaz; Fatih Dikici
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Comparison of radiofrequency kyphoplasty (RFK) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Jin-Ming Shen; Chun Feng; Jie Chen; Yu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation versus traditional balloon kyphoplasty: radiographic and morphologic outcomes of an ex vivo biomechanical pilot study.

Authors:  Brian E Dalton; Andrew C Kohm; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block; Robert D Poser
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of bone screw fixation with a novel bone cement.

Authors:  Tiina Juvonen; Juha-Pekka Nuutinen; Arto P Koistinen; Heikki Kröger; Reijo Lappalainen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.