Literature DB >> 33453016

Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art.

Ahmed K Emara1, Mitchell Ng1, Viktor E Krebs1, Michael Bloomfield1, Robert M Molloy1, Nicolas S Piuzzi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the (1) indications, (2) preoperative precautions, and (3) stepwise technical details of modern femoral stem cemented fixation. RECENT
FINDINGS: Femoral stem cementation provides excellent implant longevity with a low periprosthetic fracture rate among patients with compromised bone quality or aberrant anatomy. Unfamiliarity with the details of modern cementation techniques among trainees who may lack frequent exposure to cementing femoral stems may preclude them from offering this viable option to suitable patients in later stages of their careers. As such, maximizing benefit from cemented femoral stem fixation among suitable candidates is contingent upon the meticulous use of modern cementation techniques. In addition to proper patient selection, modern cementation techniques emphasize the use of (1) pulsatile lavage of the femoral canal, (2) utilization of epinephrine-soaked swabs, (3) vacuum cement mixing, (4) retrograde cement introduction, (5) cement pressurization, and (6) the use of stem centralizers. Furthermore, identifying and optimizing the preoperative status of at-risk patients with pre-existing cardiopulmonary compromise, in addition to intraoperative vigilance, are essential for mitigating the risk of developing bone cement implantation syndrome. Further research is required to assess the utility of cemented femoral stem fixation among younger patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cemented femoral stem fixation; Femoral stem design; Hemiarthroplasty; Modern cementation technique; Operative steps; Total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33453016     DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09681-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  26 in total

1.  Normalized and proportionalized cemented femoral stem survivorship at 15 years.

Authors:  W L Jaffe; C A Hawkins
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saam Morshed; Kevin J Bozic; Michael D Ries; Henrik Malchau; John M Colford
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Twenty-year survivorship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Merrill A Ritter; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Cemented Femoral Component Use in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  John A Scanelli; Geoffrey R Reiser; John F Sloboda; Joseph T Moskal
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  A review of current fixation use and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox.

Authors:  Anders Troelsen; Erik Malchau; Nanna Sillesen; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Stephen E Graves; Andrea Peng; Andrew J Shimmin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Systematic review of literature of cemented femoral components: what is the durability at minimum 20 years followup?

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; John J Callaghan; Michael D Stefl; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kelly L Corbett; Elena Losina; Akosua A Nti; Julian J Z Prokopetz; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An international comparison of THA patients, implants, techniques, and survivorship in Sweden, Australia, and the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Guy Cafri; Szilard Nemes; Michelle Lorimer; Johan Kärrholm; Henrik Malchau; Stephen E Graves; Robert S Namba; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a trabecular titanium™ acetabular component in hip arthroplasty: results at minimum 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Loris Perticarini; Giacomo Zanon; Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi; Francesco M Benazzo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty; increased risk of early periprosthetic fracture requiring revision surgery in elderly females.

Authors:  S R Hopman; T S de Windt; J H J van Erp; J E J Bekkers; A de Gast
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.