Literature DB >> 21249410

Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

K-H Hung1, J-J Yan, Y-C Lu, H-M Chen, J-J Wu.   

Abstract

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends testing coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) strains to determine resistance against oxacillin by testing for mecA, PBP2a, or with cefoxitin disk. However, discrepant results of resistance to oxacillin and susceptibility to cefoxitin were found. In this study, we aimed to investigate the oxacillin resistance and cefoxitin susceptibility of CoNS in Taiwan. Of 9,017 strains collected from 2005 to 2010, 131 (1.5%) of the isolates were oxacillin-resistant and cefoxitin-susceptible. Species identification was carried out using the Vitek 2 system or 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were examined by the agar dilution method. The presence of mecA and the activity of β-lactamase were performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Cefinase disks, respectively. Overall, 33% (43/129) of the strains carried mecA and 43% (37/86) of mecA-negative isolates tested positive for β-lactamase. The remaining 49 isolates were negative for both mecA and β-lactamase, and were mainly Staphylococcus cohnii ssp. urealyticus and S. saprophyticus (oxacillin MICs 0.5-2 μg/ml) obtained from bloodstream and urinary tract infections. Our study suggests that incorrect reporting can be found in CoNS using cefoxitin disk alone to determine the susceptibility to oxacillin, and the strains should be further tested for oxacillin MICs and detection of the mecA gene or β-lactamase activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21249410     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1156-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  10 in total

1.  Signaling antibiotic resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  G L Archer; J M Bosilevac
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Is the cefoxitin disk test reliable enough to detect oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci?

Authors:  Eliete A M Frigatto; Antonia M O Machado; Antônio C C Pignatari; Ana C Gales
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the Vitek 2 system with a variety of Staphylococcus species.

Authors:  Julien Delmas; Jean Paul Chacornac; Frédéric Robin; Philippe Giammarinaro; Régine Talon; Richard Bonnet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Identification of Staphylococcus spp. by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of dnaJ gene.

Authors:  Tomasz Hauschild; Srdjan Stepanovic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of alternative disk diffusion methods for detecting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in an international collection of staphylococci: validation report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Sudha Pottumarthy; Thomas R Fritsche; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Risk factors and management of Gram-positive bacteraemia.

Authors:  Carlos Cervera; Manel Almela; José A Martínez-Martínez; Asunción Moreno; José M Miró
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K Murakami; W Minamide; K Wada; E Nakamura; H Teraoka; S Watanabe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Understanding the physiology and adaptation of staphylococci: a post-genomic approach.

Authors:  Karsten Becker; Gabriele Bierbaum; Christof von Eiff; Susanne Engelmann; Friedrich Götz; Jörg Hacker; Michael Hecker; Georg Peters; Ralf Rosenstein; Wilma Ziebuhr
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 9.  Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  Brigitte Berger-Bächi; Susanne Rohrer
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Comparison of cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion methods for detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in a large-scale study.

Authors:  Nicole M Broekema; Tam T Van; Timothy A Monson; Steven A Marshall; David M Warshauer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Detection of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci by the Vitek 2 system.

Authors:  Kristen N Johnson; Kathleen Andreacchio; Paul H Edelstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Reply to "use of alternative reference standards and exempted species to evaluate the performance of the Vitek 2 GP67 cefoxitin/oxacillin screen for coagulase-negative staphylococci".

Authors:  Kristen N Johnson; Paul H Edelstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin disk susceptibility for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K-H Hung; J-J Yan; Y-C Lu; H-M Chen; J-J Wu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Prevalence of the Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Coagulase-Positive-and Negative-Staphylococcus in Chicken Meat Retailed to Consumers.

Authors:  Kamelia Osman; Jihan Badr; Khalid S Al-Maary; Ihab M I Moussa; Ashgan M Hessain; Zeinab M S Amin Girah; Usama H Abo-Shama; Ahmed Orabi; Aalaa Saad
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  First documented case of a Staphylococcus lugdunensis strain carrying the mecA gene in Northern Europe.

Authors:  Gustaf Starlander; Marcus Wirén; Asa Melhus
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.