Literature DB >> 21445653

Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin disk susceptibility for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

K-H Hung1, J-J Yan, Y-C Lu, H-M Chen, J-J Wu.   

Abstract

The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute recommends that if both cefoxitin and oxacillin are tested against Staphylococcus aureus and either result is measured as resistant, the organism should be reported as oxacillin resistant. This indicates that discrepancies may be present between oxacillin and cefoxitin sensitivities in S. aureus. In this study, we aimed to investigate the discrepancy between oxacillin and cefoxitin susceptibility in S. aureus clinical isolates. Of 10,980 S. aureus isolates recovered from 2005 to 2010, 27 (0.3%) isolates with discordant results between oxacillin and cefoxitin were collected. Fourteen (oxacillin diameters 10-12 mm) of the 27 strains were susceptible (MICs = 0.5-2 μg/ml) and 13 (6-13 mm) were resistant (4->256 μg/ml) to oxacillin. The cefoxitin MICs of 14 oxacillin-susceptible and 13 oxacillin-resistant strains ranged between 4 and 8 and 8 to 32 μg/ml, respectively. Discrepancies were present between oxacillin and cefoxitin in S. aureus, and these strains should be further tested for oxacillin MICs and for the mecA gene or β-lactamase activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21445653     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1207-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  9 in total

1.  Is the cefoxitin disk test reliable enough to detect oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci?

Authors:  Eliete A M Frigatto; Antonia M O Machado; Antônio C C Pignatari; Ana C Gales
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kunyan Zhang; Jo-Ann McClure; Sameer Elsayed; Thomas Louie; John M Conly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Frank R DeLeo; Michael Otto; Barry N Kreiswirth; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Evaluation of alternative disk diffusion methods for detecting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in an international collection of staphylococci: validation report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Sudha Pottumarthy; Thomas R Fritsche; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  K-H Hung; J-J Yan; Y-C Lu; H-M Chen; J-J Wu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Cefoxitin resistance as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Clarence J Fernandes; Lorna A Fernandes; Peter Collignon
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  Brigitte Berger-Bächi; Susanne Rohrer
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Novel staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type, tentatively designated type VIII, harboring class A mec and type 4 ccr gene complexes in a Canadian epidemic strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Kunyan Zhang; Jo-Ann McClure; Sameer Elsayed; John M Conly
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparison of cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion methods for detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in a large-scale study.

Authors:  Nicole M Broekema; Tam T Van; Timothy A Monson; Steven A Marshall; David M Warshauer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.