Literature DB >> 15629230

Evaluation of alternative disk diffusion methods for detecting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in an international collection of staphylococci: validation report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

Sudha Pottumarthy1, Thomas R Fritsche, Ronald N Jones.   

Abstract

To validate the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations of the cefoxitin disk as a preferred surrogate marker to detect oxacillin resistance in staphylococcal isolates, 304 staphylococcal isolates originating from 49 sites in 16 countries in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2003) were tested. Two hundred three Staphylococcus aureus and 101 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), of which >95% were bloodstream isolates, were evaluated by comparing the results of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution method for oxacillin with those of the disk diffusion test using oxacillin, cefoxitin and ceftizoxime disks. Discrepancies were resolved using the PBP2a latex agglutination test. For S. aureus, the cefoxitin disk performed without interpretive error followed by the ceftizoxime disk (1% major and 0.5% minor errors; > or =20 mm = susceptible); use of the oxacillin disk test had the highest error rates with 4.4% major and 1.5% minor errors, whereas the oxacillin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) test was 99.0% accurate. For CoNS, the oxacillin disk test had the highest error rate with 4.0% major errors, followed by the cefoxitin (3.0% major error rate) and the ceftizoxime (1% very major and 1% minor error: > or =20 mm = susceptible) disk tests. The oxacillin MIC test was also 99.0% accurate for CoNS testing. Modification of the ceftizoxime disk diffusion breakpoints for CoNS resulted in complete intermethod categorical agreement. The overall accuracy of the four tests was as follows: modified ceftizoxime disk (99.3%) > oxacillin MIC = cefoxitin disk (99.0%) > current ceftizoxime disk (98.4%) > oxacillin disk (94.7%). In conclusion, these results confirm the superior performance characteristics of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime disk tests as surrogate markers to detect oxacillin resistance; by using an international collection of clinically significant staphylococcal isolates, we also demonstrate its wide global application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15629230     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  14 in total

1.  Superior discriminative performance of ceftizoxime disk diffusion test for detecting meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J H T Wagenvoort; V E Ciraci; R J R Penders; J H M Gronenschild; E I G B De Brauwer; W H F Goessens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Leonard A Mermel; Michael Allon; Emilio Bouza; Donald E Craven; Patricia Flynn; Naomi P O'Grady; Issam I Raad; Bart J A Rijnders; Robert J Sherertz; David K Warren
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints for β-lactam agents other than penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; Janet A Hindler; Howard S Gold; Brandi Limbago
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Clinical and Microbiological Aspects of β-Lactam Resistance in Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Authors:  Ian H McHardy; Jennifer Veltman; Janet Hindler; Katia Bruxvoort; Marissa M Carvalho; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of discrepancies between oxacillin and cefoxitin disk susceptibility for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K-H Hung; J-J Yan; Y-C Lu; H-M Chen; J-J Wu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Accuracy of cefoxitin disk testing for characterization of oxacillin resistance mediated by penicillin-binding protein 2a in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  B Perazzi; M Rodríguez Fermepin; A Malimovka; S D García; M Orgambide; C A Vay; R de Torres; A M R Famiglietti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Phenotypic detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by disk diffusion testing and Etest on Mueller-Hinton agar.

Authors:  R Skov; R Smyth; A R Larsen; A Bolmstrôm; A Karlsson; K Mills; N Frimodt-Moller; G Kahlmeter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Correlation between the VITEK2 system and cefoxitin disk diffusion for the daily detection of oxacillin resistance in a large number of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  P Bemer; M E Juvin; G Le Gargasson; H Drugeon; A Reynaud; S Corvec
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Evaluation of phenotypic and molecular methods for detection of oxacillin resistance in members of the Staphylococcus sciuri group.

Authors:  Srdjan Stepanović; Tomasz Hauschild; Ivana Dakić; Zainab Al-Doori; Milena Svabić-Vlahović; Lazar Ranin; Donald Morrison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of new Vitek 2 card and disk diffusion method for determining susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin.

Authors:  Sandrine Roisin; Claire Nonhoff; Olivier Denis; Marc J Struelens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.