Literature DB >> 24951799

Detection of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci by the Vitek 2 system.

Kristen N Johnson1, Kathleen Andreacchio2, Paul H Edelstein3.   

Abstract

The accurate performance of the Vitek 2 GP67 card for detecting methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is not known. We prospectively determined the ability of the Vitek 2 GP67 card to accurately detect methicillin-resistant CoNS, with mecA PCR results used as the gold standard for a 4-month period in 2012. Included in the study were 240 consecutively collected nonduplicate CoNS isolates. Cefoxitin susceptibility by disk diffusion testing was determined for all isolates. We found that the three tested systems, Vitek 2 oxacillin and cefoxitin testing and cefoxitin disk susceptibility testing, lacked specificity and, in some cases, sensitivity for detecting methicillin resistance. The Vitek 2 oxacillin and cefoxitin tests had very major error rates of 4% and 8%, respectively, and major error rates of 38% and 26%, respectively. Disk cefoxitin testing gave the best performance, with very major and major error rates of 2% and 24%, respectively. The test performances were species dependent, with the greatest errors found for Staphylococcus saprophyticus. While the 2014 CLSI guidelines recommend reporting isolates that test resistant by the oxacillin MIC or cefoxitin disk test as oxacillin resistant, following such guidelines produces erroneous results, depending on the test method and bacterial species tested. Vitek 2 cefoxitin testing is not an adequate substitute for cefoxitin disk testing. For critical-source isolates, mecA PCR, rather than Vitek 2 or cefoxitin disk testing, is required for optimal antimicrobial therapy.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24951799      PMCID: PMC4313137          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01162-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Performances of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards for identification of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Frédéric Wallet; Caroline Loïez; Emilie Renaux; Nadine Lemaitre; René J Courcol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Vitek 2 system with a variety of Staphylococcus species.

Authors:  Julien Delmas; Jean Paul Chacornac; Frédéric Robin; Philippe Giammarinaro; Régine Talon; Richard Bonnet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Results of disk diffusion testing with cefoxitin correlate with presence of mecA in Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  Jana M Swenson; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococci with the VITEK 2 system.

Authors:  Matthias A Horstkotte; Johannes K-M Knobloch; Holger Rohde; Sabine Dobinsky; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K Murakami; W Minamide; K Wada; E Nakamura; H Teraoka; S Watanabe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of three phenotypic techniques for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus spp. reveals a species-dependent performance.

Authors:  Michael A John; Julia Burden; J Ian Stuart; Romina C Reyes; Robert Lannigan; Sue Milburn; Deb Diagre; Bev Wilson; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Evaluation of RapiDEC Staph for identification of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.

Authors:  W M Janda; K Ristow; D Novak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Is resistance to novobiocin a reliable test for confirmation of the identification of Staphylococcus saprophyticus?

Authors:  L A McTaggart; T S Elliott
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Revised interpretation of oxacillin MICs for Staphylococcus epidermidis based on mecA detection.

Authors:  C L McDonald; W E Maher; R J Fass
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of the MicroScan, VITEK 2, and Crystal GP with 16S rRNA sequencing and MicroSeq 500 v2.0 analysis for coagulase-negative Staphylococci.

Authors:  Miyoung Kim; Se Ran Heo; Soon Hee Choi; Hyelin Kwon; Jeong Su Park; Moon-Woo Seong; Do-Hoon Lee; Kyoung Un Park; Junghan Song; Eui-Chong Kim
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion and MIC Breakpoints Established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for Detection of mecA-Mediated Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus schleiferi.

Authors:  H K Huse; S A Miller; S Chandrasekaran; J A Hindler; S D Lawhon; D A Bemis; L F Westblade; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of alternative reference standards and exempted species to evaluate the performance of the Vitek 2 GP67 cefoxitin/oxacillin screen for coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  W Michael Dunne; Rita Griffith; Virginia Shortridge
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Direct disk diffusion test using European Clinical Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints provides reliable results compared with the standard method.

Authors:  Sofia Stokkou; Gernot Geginat; Dirk Schlüter; Ina Tammer
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2015-03-26

4.  Evaluation of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin Disk and MIC Breakpoints for Prediction of Methicillin Resistance in Human and Veterinary Isolates of Staphylococcus intermedius Group.

Authors:  M T Wu; C-A D Burnham; L F Westblade; J Dien Bard; S D Lawhon; M A Wallace; T Stanley; E Burd; J Hindler; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Virulence Factors in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.

Authors:  Angela França; Vânia Gaio; Nathalie Lopes; Luís D R Melo
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  It's Not You, It's SOSA: A Case Study on Breaking Up With an FDA-Cleared Susceptibility Testing System's Oxacillin Results for Staphylococcus spp. Other Than S. aureus and S. lugdunensis.

Authors:  Christine Yang; Melis N Anahtar; Virginia M Pierce
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.423

7.  Comparative Performances of Vitek-2, Disk Diffusion, and Broth Microdilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Canine Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.

Authors:  Elisa Rampacci; Michele Trotta; Caterina Fani; Serenella Silvestri; Valentina Stefanetti; Chiara Brachelente; Antonella Mencacci; Fabrizio Passamonti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.