| Literature DB >> 21249207 |
Morag Graham1, Binhua Liang, Gary Van Domselaar, Nathalie Bastien, Carole Beaudoin, Shaun Tyler, Brynn Kaplen, Erika Landry, Yan Li.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21249207 PMCID: PMC3017559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Geographical and clade distributions for A/H1N1pdm viruses sampled in Canada.
Phylogenetic analysis was performed with two hundred thirty five viruses sampled in Canada and linked to their corresponding clades, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2Spatial patterning of Canadian A/H1N1pdm viruses.
Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the neighbour-joining distance method, with genetic distances calculated by maximum likelihood using Kimura's two-parameter model (K2P) in MEGA 4.0. The resultant consensus tree was generated using the Summarization of Split Support on Phylogenetic Trees (SumTrees) program ver. 1.02. Lineages are colour-coded according to the region of virus collection.
Figure 3Phylogenetic relationships for A/H1N1pdm viruses sampled from Canada and globally.
Phylogenetic tree inferred for two hundred thirty five virus whole genomes sampled from Canada and representative global reference genomes using the Neighbour-joining (NJ) method. Scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Colour-coding: clade 1 (not shown); clade 2 (orange); clade 3 (teal); clade 4 (yellow); clade 5 (green); clade 6 (blue), and clade 7 (pink).
Figure 4Temporal patterning of Canadian A/H1N1pdm viruses.
Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the neighbour-joining distance method, with genetic distances calculated by maximum likelihood using Kimura's two-parameter model (K2P) in MEGA 4.0. The resultant consensus tree was generated using the Summarization of Split Support on Phylogenetic Trees (SumTrees) program ver. 1.02. Clade distributions are colour-coded according to 1, 3 or 5 week time periods corresponding to virus collection dates.
Genetic diversity of A/H1N1pdm coding sequences sampled in Canada.
| Viral Segment | Gene | NT | AA |
| 1 | PB2 | 2.14×10−4 | 2.32×10−4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 | PA | 2.09×10−4 | 2.87×10−4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 | M1 | 4.15×10−4 | 9.44×10−5 |
| 7 | M2 | 1.17×10−4 | 1.74×10−4 |
| 8 | NS1 | 2.53×10−4 | 6.19×10−4 |
| 8 | NEP (NS2) | 9.32×10−5 | 1.31×10−4 |
NT: nucleotide; in viruses sampled from 235 unique subjects;
AA: amino acid; in viruses sampled from 235 unique subjects;
Viral segments exhibiting highest genetic diversity are highlighted in bold font.
Entropy difference, with randomization test, between severe and mild sequence populations for A/H1N1pdm viruses sampled in Canada (during Wave 1 only).
| Nucleotide Position | Protein Position | AA Consensus (Mild/Severe) | AA Variance (Mild/Severe) |
| E-Score | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 02 | PB1-473 | PB1-158 | N (92/28) | S (12/0) | 0.010 | 0.069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 04 | HA-879 | HA-293 | Q (76/13) | H (28/11) | 0.030 | 0.140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nucleotide position on the coding sequence of each genome segment;
P values were calculated from the randomization test on entropy score differences between severe and mild sequence populations;
E-Scores were calculated from Fisher Exact Test; <0.05 highlighted in bold font.