Literature DB >> 21244117

New rule use drives the relation between working memory capacity and Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.

Jennifer Wiley1, Andrew F Jarosz, Patrick J Cushen, Gregory J H Colflesh.   

Abstract

The correlation between individual differences in working memory capacity and performance on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM) is well documented yet poorly understood. The present work proposes a new explanation: that the need to use a new combination of rules on RAPM problems drives the relation between performance and working memory capacity scores. Evidence for this account is supported by an item-based analysis of performance during standard administration of the RAPM and an experiment that manipulates the need to use new rule combinations across 2 subsets of RAPM items. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21244117     DOI： 10.1037/a0021613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN： 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  20 in total

1.  Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Zach Shipstead; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

2.  When high working memory capacity is and is not beneficial for predicting nonlinear processes.

Authors:  Helen Fischer; Daniel V Holt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

3.  Relations between Running Memory and Fluid Intelligence.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2014-03-01

4.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Ellen Sheehan; Nancy Tsai; Greg J Duncan; Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

5.  Individual differences in category learning: memorization versus rule abstraction.

Authors:  Jeri L Little; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

6.  Individual differences in learning and transfer: stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Michael J Cahill; Mathew Robbins; Chelsea Wiener
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-06-10

7.  Predicting performance on the Raven's Matrices: The roles of associative learning and retrieval efficiency.

Authors:  Lindsey Lilienthal; Elaine Tamez; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-01-01

8.  Working memory training involves learning new skills.

Authors:  Susan E Gathercole; Darren L Dunning; Joni Holmes; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Working memory load-dependent changes in cortical network connectivity estimated by machine learning.

Authors:  Hamdi Eryilmaz; Kevin F Dowling; Dylan E Hughes; Anais Rodriguez-Thompson; Alexandra Tanner; Charlie Huntington; William G Coon; Joshua L Roffman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Which Tools in Multimedia Are Best for Learning Outcomes? A Study Grounded in Cognitive Load Structures.

Authors:  Glenn-Egil Torgersen; Ole Boe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.