Literature DB >> 21228175

Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking.

Trafton Drew1, Todd S Horowitz, Jeremy M Wolfe, Edward K Vogel.   

Abstract

In the attentive tracking task, observers track multiple objects as they move independently and unpredictably among visually identical distractors. Although a number of models of attentive tracking implicate visual working memory as the mechanism responsible for representing target locations, no study has ever directly compared the neural mechanisms of the two tasks. In the current set of experiments, we used electrophysiological recordings to delineate similarities and differences between the neural processing involved in working memory and attentive tracking. We found that the contralateral electrophysiological response to the two tasks was similarly sensitive to the number of items attended in both tasks but that there was also a unique contralateral negativity related to the process of monitoring target position during tracking. This signal was absent for periods of time during tracking tasks when objects briefly stopped moving. These results provide evidence that, during attentive tracking, the process of tracking target locations elicits an electrophysiological response that is distinct and dissociable from neural measures of the number of items being attended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228175      PMCID: PMC4486118          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1339-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  38 in total

1.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  J Jay Todd; René Marois
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis.

Authors:  Kairi Kreegipuu; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-25

4.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.

Authors:  Z W Pylyshyn; R W Storm
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1988

7.  Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

8.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Andrew W McCollough; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST.

Authors:  S Treue; J H Maunsell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Spatial attention modulates center-surround interactions in macaque visual area v4.

Authors:  Kristy A Sundberg; Jude F Mitchell; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  21 in total

1.  Neural limits to representing objects still within view.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsubomi; Keisuke Fukuda; Katsumi Watanabe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Come together, right now: dynamic overwriting of an object's history through common fate.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Restoring Latent Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Edward F Ester; John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  A soft handoff of attention between cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Irida Mance; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-07

8.  Two-year-olds succeed at MIT: Multiple identity tracking in 20- and 25-month-old infants.

Authors:  Chen Cheng; Zsuzsa Kaldy; Erik Blaser
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-07-25

9.  Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Keisuke Fukuda; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Shifting selection may control apparent motion.

Authors:  Yangqing Xu; Satoru Suzuki; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.