Literature DB >> 18390491

Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions using surgical navigation.

Andrew D Pearle1, Fintan J Shannon, Carinne Granchi, Thomas L Wickiewicz, Russell F Warren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical navigation allows continuous intraoperative monitoring of ACL graft anisometry and 3-dimensional obliquity. However, normative anisometry and obliquity measurements for different single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament graft positions are not well described. HYPOTHESIS: ACL Grafts placed in anteromedial and posterolateral bundle positions will have distinct anisometric profiles and 3-dimensional obliquities. A graft placed centrally in anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites will have different obliquity and anisometry than a conventional (single-bundle) graft extending from the tibia's posterolateral aspect to the femur's anteromedial aspect. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Five cadaveric knees were tested. A surgical navigation system was used to create 4 virtual graft positions in the anterior cruciate ligament footprint: (1) anteromedial, (2) posterolateral, (3) central, and (4) posterolateral tibia to anteromedial femur (conventional). Obliquity at various flexion angles and anisometry of each virtual graft's central fiber were determined.
RESULTS: Anteromedial and posterolateral fibers are relatively parallel up to 30 degrees of flexion. At higher degrees of flexion, the anteromedial position is more oblique in the sagittal plane, while the posterolateral position is more oblique in the axial plane. The conventional single-bundle position is significantly more vertical than the central position in multiple planes throughout the range of motion. The anteromedial fiber is most isometric, while the posterolateral fiber is the least isometric at all flexion angles. There is no significant difference in the anisometry between the central or conventional positions at any flexion angle. The posterolateral, central, and conventional fibers were longest at full extension and slackened with progressive flexion.
CONCLUSION: Anteromedial and posterolateral graft positions can be distinguished by sagittal and axial plane obliquity at flexion angles >30 degrees and by anisometry measurements. Conventional positioning produces a relatively vertical graft placement compared with the central position but has similar anisometry characteristics. Our data suggest that posterolateral, central, and conventional grafts should be fixed at or near full extension to avoid excessive tightening during motion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides anisometry and 3-dimensional obliquity data for various graft positions using surgical navigation. The failure of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to restore intact knee kinematics may be partly due to the relative vertical placement of conventional grafts compared with the central anterior cruciate ligament footprint position.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18390491     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508315536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  25 in total

1.  Anteromedial versus central single-bundle graft position: which anatomic graft position to choose?

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Volker Musahl; Asheesh Bedi; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Sommer Hammoud; Eduardo Suero; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Measuring the anterior cruciate ligament's footprints by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yung Han; David Kurzencwyg; Adam Hart; Tom Powell; Paul A Martineau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparison of tunnel positions in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using computer navigation.

Authors:  James E Voos; Volker Musahl; Travis G Maak; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Computer-Assisted Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Henning Windhagen; Christian Krettek; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Open wedge valgus tibial osteotomies: affecting the distinct ACL bundles.

Authors:  Daniel Kendoff; Dimitrios Koulalis; Mustafa Citak; James Voos; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Transportal central femoral tunnel placement has a significantly higher revision rate than transtibial AM femoral tunnel placement in hamstring ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark Clatworthy; Steffen Sauer; Tim Roberts
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Applications of computer navigation in sports medicine knee surgery: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Marc R Safran; Mark Clatworthy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

9.  Kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament during gait.

Authors:  Jia-Lin Wu; Ali Hosseini; Michal Kozanek; Hemanth R Gadikota; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Isometry of medial collateral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian T Feeley; Mark S Muller; Answorth A Allen; Carinne C Granchi; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.