Literature DB >> 21225437

The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain.

F S Kleinstueck1, T Fekete, D Jeszenszky, A F Mannion, D Grob, F Lattig, U Mutter, F Porchet.   

Abstract

Decompression surgery is a common and generally successful treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, clinical practice raises some concern that the presence of concomitant low back pain (LBP) may have a negative influence on the overall outcome of treatment. This prospective study sought to examine on how the relative severity of LBP influences the outcome of decompression surgery for LDH. The SSE Spine Tango System was used to acquire the data from 308 patients. Inclusion criteria were LDH, first-time surgery, maximum 1 affected level, and decompression as the only procedure. Before and 12 months after surgery, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; includes 0-10 leg/buttock pain (LP) and LBP scales); at 12 months, global outcome was rated on a Likert scale and dichotomised into "good" and "poor" groups. In the "good" outcome group, mean baseline LP was 2.8 (SD 3.1) points higher than LBP; in the "poor" group, the corresponding value was 1.1 (SD 2.9) (p < 0.001 between groups). Significantly fewer patients with back pain as their "main problem" had a good outcome (69% good) when compared with those who reported leg/buttock pain (84% good) as the main problem (p = 0.04). In multivariate regression analyses (controlling for age, gender, co-morbidity), baseline LBP intensity was a significant predictor of the 12-month COMI score, and of the global outcome (each p < 0.05) (higher LBP, worse outcome). In conclusion, patients with more back pain showed significantly worse outcomes after decompression surgery for LDH. This finding fits with general clinical experience, but has rarely been quantified in the many predictor studies conducted to date. Consideration of the severity of concomitant LBP in LDH may assist in establishing realistic patient expectations before the surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21225437      PMCID: PMC3176694          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1670-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

Review 1.  [Surgical treatment of low back pain].

Authors:  B Magnaes
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1999-05-10

2.  Clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of compressed lumbar nerve roots.

Authors:  H Matsui; M Kanamori; Y Kawaguchi; H Kitagawa; H Nakamura; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering; Ralph Staerkle; Astrid Junge; Dieter Grob; Norbert K Semmer; Nicola Jacobshagen; Jiri Dvorak; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years' follow up.

Authors:  A Junge; M Fröhlich; S Ahrens; M Hasenbring; A Sandler; D Grob; J Dvorák
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Quality of life assessment before and after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kagaya; Hitomi Takahashi; Keiyu Sugawara; Toshiki Kuroda; Masato Takahama
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Health-related quality of life in patients before and after surgery for a herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K-A Jansson; G Németh; F Granath; B Jönsson; P Blomqvist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

8.  [The delayed OP--indications for surgery of lumbar disc herniations].

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2005 May-Jun

9.  A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Annertz; C Sjöberg; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Marek Szpalski; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery?

Authors:  O M Stokes; A A Cole; L M Breakwell; A J Lloyd; C M Leonard; M Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Validity of a single-item measure to assess leg or back pain as the predominant symptom in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A F Mannion; U M Mutter; T F Fekete; F Porchet; D Jeszenszky; F S Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Does neck pain as chief complaint influence the outcome of cervical total disc replacement?

Authors:  S Finkenstaedt; A F Mannion; T F Fekete; D Haschtmann; F S Kleinstueck; U Mutter; H J Becker; D Bellut; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  EUROSPINE 2017 FULL PAPER AWARD: Time to remove our rose-tinted spectacles: a candid appraisal of the relative success of surgery in over 4500 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, hip or knee.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Franco M Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig; Dezsö Jeszenszy; Hans-Jürgen Becker; Daniel Haschtmann; Stefan Preiss; Tamas F Fekete
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgical training in spine surgery: safety and patient-rated outcome.

Authors:  Guy Waisbrod; Anne F Mannion; Támas F Fekete; Frank Kleinstueck; Deszö Jeszenszky; Daniel Haschtmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Sciatica caused by disc herniation: Why is Chymopapain Chemonucleolysis denied to our patients?

Authors:  Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12-31

10.  Adult degenerative scoliosis: comparison of patient-rated outcome after three different surgical treatments.

Authors:  F S Kleinstueck; T F Fekete; D Jeszenszky; D Haschtmann; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.