Literature DB >> 8724090

Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years' follow up.

A Junge1, M Fröhlich, S Ahrens, M Hasenbring, A Sandler, D Grob, J Dvorák.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Based on prospective assessment, patients with lumbar disc surgery were examined to determine reliable predictors for clinical outcome.
OBJECTIVES: The prognostic value of a screening checklist developed in a previous study was evaluated in a 2-year follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Outcome studies of lumbar disc surgery document a success rate between 49-90%. It has been shown that a number of medical history data and sociodemographic and psychodiagnostic findings are of prognostic value for the outcome of lumbar spine surgery.
METHODS: In addition to clinical and neuroradiologic examinations, 164 patients took part in a standardized interview. Eighty-two percent participated in a follow-up performed 2 years after the operation. Preoperative findings, outcome, and prediction of three diagnostic subgroups were compared. Eighty-three (51%) patients had disc herniation only, 29 (18%) had disc herniation and other relevant back diagnoses, and 51 (31%) had no disc herniation but had other relevant back diagnoses.
RESULTS: In patients with disc herniation only, good results were observed in 53%, moderate in 19%, and bad in 28%. The accuracy of prediction of the postoperative result was 75% for the patients with good outcome and 86% for those with bad outcome. In the group of patients with diagnoses other than disc herniation, the success rate of the operation was 38% good, 28% moderate, and 41% bad, but the predictor score was not as useful as for the other groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients with a high risk of a bad operation outcome after lumbar discectomy could be identified preoperatively. It is suggested that those patients take part in a pain management approach instead of or in addition to surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8724090     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  29 in total

1.  Can psychological distress be detected by response to a needle stick?

Authors:  Robert F Haynsworth; Timothy Clark; Carl E Noe; Jennifer Holmes; Eric Havemann
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2002-01

Review 2.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Karsten Wiechert; Mohamed F Khattab; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Fighting to help lower costs: Making a financial case for chiropractic.

Authors:  Jc Smith
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2002

Review 5.  [Can failed back surgery be prevented? Psychological risk factors for postoperative pain after back surgery].

Authors:  R Klinger; F Geiger; M Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Predictors of clinical outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the value of historical, physical examination, and muscle function variables.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Anne Thackeray; Per Kjaer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Responsiveness of depression and its influence on surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Asdrubal Falavigna; Orlando Righesso; Alisson Roberto Teles; Lucas Piccoli Conzati; Julia Bertholdo Bossardi; Pedro Guarise da Silva; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-22

8.  Health behavior change counseling in surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: patient activation mediates the effects of health behavior change counseling on rehabilitation engagement.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; David Li; Lee H Riley; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Telephone-Based Intervention to Improve Rehabilitation Engagement After Spinal Stenosis Surgery: A Prospective Lagged Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; Stephen T Wegener; Lee H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  To what degree do shoulder outcome instruments reflect patients' psychologic distress?

Authors:  Young Hak Roh; Jung Ho Noh; Joo Han Oh; Goo Hyun Baek; Hyun Sik Gong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.