Literature DB >> 21222034

Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new high-definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT.

Yutaka Tanami1, Masahiro Jinzaki, Minoru Yamada, Yasuhiro Imai, Koji Segawa, Sachio Kuribayashi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate improvement of measurement accuracy of in-stent lumen using coronary stent phantoms on new high-definition CT (HDCT) compared with conventional 64 detector-row CT (MDCT). To estimate the spatial resolution, a high-resolution insert of CATPHAN (The Phantom Laboratory, NY, USA) was scanned by both HDCT (Discovery CT750 HD) and MDCT (LightSpeed VCT). Also, we developed six types of stent phantom, which have 2.5- and 3.0-mm-diameter with three different types of stents (Velocity: Johnson & Johnson, Driver: Medtronic, Multilink-Rx: Guidant). A 50% stenotic segment made of acrylic resin was built at the center inside the stent. Those coronary vessel phantoms were made of acrylic resin and filled with diluted Iodine (350 HU in 120 kVp), and each stent was fixed inside of those vessels. Those phantoms in water-filled tank were scanned on both HDCT and MDCT. The luminal diameter obtained using digital calipers at five different points and the mean luminal diameter (MLD) were calculated. The underestimate ratio (UR) and △UR was defined as follows: UR = [True diameter of stent-MLD]/True diameter of stent; △UR = [MLD at HDCT-MLD at MDCT]/True diameter of stent. The spatial resolution was estimated to be 0.71 mm on MDCT and 0.50 mm on HDCT. At the non-stenotic segments, the △URs were 11.6% (Velocity), 16.4% (Driver) and 7.2% (Multilink) for the 2.5-mm stents, and 14.0% (Velocity), 16.3% (Driver) and 13.3% (Multilink) for the 3.0-mm stents. At the stenotic segment, the △URs were 23.2% (Velocity), 8.0% (Driver) and 13.6% (Multilink) for the 2.5-mm stents, and 20.0% (Velocity), 14.7% (Driver) and 15.3% (Multilink) for the 3.0-mm stents. Superior spatial resolution of HDCT could be promising for more accurate measurement of in-stent diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21222034     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9786-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  11 in total

1.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Allen J Taylor; Manuel Cerqueira; John McB Hodgson; Daniel Mark; James Min; Patrick O'Gara; Geoffrey D Rubin; Christopher M Kramer; Daniel Berman; Alan Brown; Farooq A Chaudhry; Ricardo C Cury; Milind Y Desai; Andrew J Einstein; Antoinette S Gomes; Robert Harrington; Udo Hoffmann; Rahul Khare; John Lesser; Christopher McGann; Alan Rosenberg; Robert Schwartz; Marc Shelton; Gerald W Smetana; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Tobias Seyfarth; Thomas Flohr; Christopher Herzog; Jochen Stahl; Sven Stanzel; Axel Kuettner; Joachim E Wildberger; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography.

Authors:  Johannes Rixe; Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Axel Kuettner; Ulrike Ropers; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Katharina Anders
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Dharam J Kumbhani; Christopher P Ingelmo; Paul Schoenhagen; Ronan J Curtin; Scott D Flamm; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system.

Authors:  Thomas G Flohr; Cynthia H McCollough; Herbert Bruder; Martin Petersilka; Klaus Gruber; Christoph Süss; Michael Grasruck; Karl Stierstorfer; Bernhard Krauss; Rainer Raupach; Andrew N Primak; Axel Küttner; Stefan Achenbach; Christoph Becker; Andreas Kopp; Bernd M Ohnesorge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Martin B Leon; Jeffrey W Moses; Jeffrey J Popma; Donald Cutlip; Peter J Fitzgerald; Charles Brown; Tim Fischell; Shing Chiu Wong; Mark Midei; David Snead; Richard E Kuntz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Morice; Antonio Colombo; Bernhard Meier; Patrick Serruys; Corrado Tamburino; Giulio Guagliumi; Eduardo Sousa; Hans-Peter Stoll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography.

Authors:  Tej Sheth; Jonathan D Dodd; Udo Hoffmann; Suhny Abbara; Aloke Finn; Herman K Gold; Thomas J Brady; Ricardo C Cury
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2012 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial.

Authors:  Andrea L Vavere; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Melvin E Clouse; David E Bush; John W M Hoe; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; João A C Lima; Julie M Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of FBP, ASiR, and MBIR reconstruction during CT angiography in the evaluation of a vessel phantom with calcified stenosis in a distal superficial femoral artery in a cadaver extremity.

Authors:  Jitsuro Tsukada; Minoru Yamada; Yoshitake Yamada; Shun Yamazaki; Nobuaki Imanishi; Kentaro Tamura; Masahiro Hashimoto; Seishi Nakatsuka; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Performance of dual-source CT with high pitch spiral mode for coronary stent patency compared with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Xia Yang; Qiang Yu; Wei Dong; Zhen-Hong Fu; Jun-Jue Yang; Jun Guo; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Improvement in CT image resolution due to the use of focal spot deflection and increased sampling.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubert; Timothy Szczykutowicz; Frank Ranallo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.