Literature DB >> 18309263

Molecular analysis of bacterial community structures in paddy soils for environmental risk assessment with two varieties of genetically modified rice, Iksan 483 and Milyang 204.

Min-Cheol Kim1, Jae-Hyung Ahn, Hye-Chul Shin, Taesung Kim, Tae-Hun Ryu, Dong-Hern Kim, Hong-Gyu Song, Geon Hyoung Lee, Jong-Ok Ka.   

Abstract

The impacts of planted transgenic rice varieties on bacterial communities in paddy soils were monitored using both cultivation and molecular methods. The rice field plot consisted of eighteen subplots planted with two genetically modified (GM) rice and four non-GM rice plants in three replicates. Analysis with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes revealed that the bacterial community structures were quite similar to each other in a given month, suggesting that there were no significant differences in bacterial communities between GM and non- GM rice soils. The bacterial community structures appeared to be generally stable with the seasons, as shown by a slight variation of microbial population levels and DGGE banding patterns over the year. Comparison analysis of 16S rDNA clone libraries constructed from soil bacterial DNA showed that there were no significant differences between GM and non-GM soil libraries but revealed seasonal differences of phyla distribution between August and December. The composition profile of phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) between GM and non-GM soils also was not significantly different to each other. When soil DNAs were analyzed with PCR by using primers for the bar gene, which was introduced into GM rice, positive DNA bands were found in October and December soils. However, no bar gene sequence was detected in PCR analysis with DNAs extracted from both cultured and uncultured soil bacterial fractions. The result of this study suggested that, in spite of seasonal variations of bacterial communities and persistence of the bar gene, the bacterial communities of the experimental rice field were not significantly affected by cultivation of GM rice varieties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18309263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1017-7825            Impact factor:   2.351


  7 in total

1.  Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice.

Authors:  Claudia Knief; Nathanaël Delmotte; Samuel Chaffron; Manuel Stark; Gerd Innerebner; Reiner Wassmann; Christian von Mering; Julia A Vorholt
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Spore-forming bacteria in soil cultivated with GM white poplars: isolation and characterization.

Authors:  M Bonadei; C Calvio; D Carbonera; A Galizzi; E Quattrini; A Balestrazzi
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings.

Authors:  Moonsuk Hur; Yongho Kim; Hae-Ryong Song; Jong Min Kim; Young Im Choi; Hana Yi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Improved pipeline for reducing erroneous identification by 16S rRNA sequences using the Illumina MiSeq platform.

Authors:  Yoon-Seong Jeon; Sang-Cheol Park; Jeongmin Lim; Jongsik Chun; Bong-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 3.422

5.  Diversity and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Fungal Communities in the Rhizosphere Soil of Cotton in the Arid Region of Northwest China.

Authors:  YingWu Shi; HongMei Yang; Ming Chu; XinXiang Niu; XiangDong Huo; Yan Gao; Jun Zeng; Qing Lin; Kai Lou
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in a genetically modified (GM) rice ecosystem.

Authors:  Seung-Hoon Lee; Chang-Gi Kim; Hojeong Kang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Molecular-based environmental risk assessment of three varieties of genetically engineered cows.

Authors:  Jianxiang Xu; Jie Zhao; Jianwu Wang; Yaofeng Zhao; Lei Zhang; Mingxing Chu; Ning Li
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 2.788

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.