| Literature DB >> 28133597 |
Junying Liu1, Wen Qiu2, Yunpu Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding about the impact of white rot fungi on indigenous bacterial communities,Entities:
Keywords: Algae; Bacterial communities; Digested piggery wastewater; Fungi; NH4+; Turbidity
Year: 2017 PMID: 28133597 PMCID: PMC5236085 DOI: 10.1186/s40643-016-0136-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioresour Bioprocess ISSN: 2197-4365
Characterization of initial effluents from piggery anaerobic digestion
| Parameter | Pre-treated value (mean ± SD) | After treatment valuea |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 8.6 ± 0.2 | 7.2 ± 0.5 |
| Color (Abs. 400 nm) | 1.1 ± 0.08 | 0.6 ± 0.07 |
| TSS (mg L−1) | 1133.3 ± 68.1 | 254.2 ± 31.7 |
| COD (mg L−1) | 625.8 ± 16.9 | 262.5 ± 12.6 |
| TN (mg L−1) | 330.6 ± 14.3 | 255.9 ± 10.9 |
| TP (mg L−1) | 50.3 ± 6.7 | 29.6 ± 8.5 |
| NH4 + (mg L−1) | 287.1 ± 25.2 | 226.6 ± 19.4 |
aThe average data of 6 pretreated wastewater by fungi
Environmental parameters used in digested piggery wastewater and Shannon-Wiener
| Code | Fungi | pH | Temperature | Shannon-Wiener |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 |
| 4 | 20 | 2.8161 |
| PC2 |
| 4 | 25 | 2.8335 |
| PC3 |
| 6 | 20 | 2.2597 |
| PC4 |
| 6 | 25 | 2.5019 |
| PC5 |
| 8 | 20 | 2.6528 |
| PC6 |
| 8 | 25 | 2.4781 |
| CK1 | No fungal inoculum | 8.6 | 20 | 2.8870 |
| CK2 | No fungal inoculum | 8.6 | 25 | 2.6138 |
Fig. 1Nutrient removal efficiency (NH4 +, TP, COD, TSS, and turbidity) of piggery wastewater by fungi at the end of experiment. PC1 (pH 4, 20 °C), PC2 (pH 4, 25 °C), PC3 (pH 6, 20 °C), PC4 (pH 6, 25 °C), PC5 (pH 8, 20 °C), PC6 (pH 4, 25 °C). CK1 (20 °C), and CK2 (25 °C) are controls. The initial physico-chemical characteristics are shown in Table 1
16S rDNA gene sequence obtained from the pretreated wastewater by white rot fungi in this study
| Clone No. | Best match database (Accession) | Similarity (%) | Environmental functions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 |
| 99 | Break down macromolecules in anaerobic digesters | Auerbach et al. ( |
| S2 |
| 100 | Anaerobic, rod-shaped bacterium to recycle fibers | Ntougias et al. ( |
| S3 |
| 100 | Exist in removal process of ammonium in the wastewater | Nakasaki et al. ( |
| S4 |
| 100 | Degrade potentially toxic compounds | Spain et al. ( |
| S5 |
| 100 | The ammonia and nitrite oxidizing bacteria | Honda and Osawa ( |
| S6 |
| 98 | Nitrification treatment of methane fermentation digestion | Qiao et al. ( |
| S7 |
| 97 | Degrade phenol and benzene | Spain et al. ( |
| S8 |
| 100 | Efficiently degrade NO3–N in semi-anaerobic condition | Yu et al. ( |
| S9 |
| 99 | Remove ammonium in the wastewater | Zhou et al. ( |
| S10 |
| 99 | Relatively high ammonium removal potential | Spain et al. ( |
| S11 |
| 100 | Remove ammonium in the wastewater | Zheng et al. ( |
| S12 |
| 100 | Degrade phenol and benzene | Spain et al. ( |
| S13 |
| 99 | Degradation of wood and cycling of nitrogen and sulfur | Lu et al. ( |
| S14 |
| 100 | Contribute to the global iron cycle | Matsunaga et al. ( |
Environmental functions were derived from literature
Fig. 2Chlorophyll concentration of algal cells grown in different pretreated wastewater by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. PC1 (pH 4, 20 °C), PC2 (pH 4, 25 °C), PC3 (pH 6, 20 °C), PC4 (pH 6, 25 °C), PC5 (pH 8, 20 °C), PC6 (pH 4, 25 °C). CK1 (20 °C), and CK2 (25 °C) are controls
Fig. 3Dry weight of algal cells grown in different pretreated wastewater by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. PC1 (pH 4, 20 °C), PC2 (pH 4, 25 °C), PC3 (pH 6, 20 °C), PC4 (pH 6, 25 °C), PC5 (pH 8, 20 °C), PC6 (pH 4, 25 °C). CK1 (20 °C), and CK2 (25 °C) are controls
Fig. 4The removal of nutrients (NH4 +, TP and COD) by algae after 9 days. PC1 (pH 4, 20 °C), PC2 (pH 4, 25 °C), PC3 (pH 6, 20 °C), PC4 (pH 6, 25 °C), PC5 (pH 8, 20 °C), PC6 (pH 4, 25 °C). CK1 (20 °C), and CK2 (25 °C) are controls
Fig. 5Algae-environment biplot from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) summarizing differences in chlorophyll, protein, carbohydrate, and lipid of different treatments (PC1–PC6, CK1, CK2) and environmental variables (i.e., pH, temperature, NH4 +, turbidity, and bacterial diversity). PC1 (pH 4, 20 °C), PC2 (pH 4, 25 °C), PC3 (pH 6, 20 °C), PC4 (pH 6, 25 °C), PC5 (pH 8, 20 °C), PC6 (pH 4, 25 °C). CK1 (20 °C), and CK2 (25 °C) are controls
Fig. 6Species-environment biplot from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) summarizing differences in bacterium species (S1–S14) of different treatments (PC1–PC6, CK1 CK2) along with environmental variables (i.e., pH, temperature, NH4 +, turbidity, and fungal pretreatment. PC1 (pH 4, 20 °C), PC2 (pH 4, 25 °C), PC3 (pH 6, 20 °C), PC4 (pH 6, 25 °C), PC5 (pH 8, 20 °C), PC6 (pH 4, 25 °C). CK1 (20 °C), and CK2 (25 °C) are controls
Fig. 7The fatty acid composition of Chlorella vulgaris after 9-day cultivation. PC1 (pH 4, 20 °C), PC2 (pH 4, 25 °C), PC3 (pH 6, 20 °C), PC4 (pH 6, 25 °C), PC5 (pH 8, 20 °C), PC6 (pH 4, 25 °C). CK1 (20 °C), and CK2 (25 °C) are controls
Comparison of nutrient removal and biomass and lipid production in microalgae grown in various wastewater conditions
| Microalgal species | Wastewater type | Nutrient removal | Biomass production | Lipid content (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tertiary municipal wastewater | 100% | 0.29 g L−1 | 30 | Ji et al. ( |
|
| Piggery wastewater effluent | 68% N, 42% P, | 1.1 g L−1 | – | Ji et al. ( |
|
| Treated domestic sewage | 73.77% N, 100% P | – | 7.6 | Sydney et al. ( |
|
| Palm oil mill effluent | – | 8.0 mg L−1 day−1 | 28.27 | Putri et al. ( |
|
| Piggery wastewater effluent | 26 mg L−1N, 1.9 mg L−1 P | 0.18 g L−1 | 27 | Ji et al. ( |
|
| Tertiary municipal wastewater | 100% | 0.31 g L−1 | 27 | Ji et al. ( |
|
| Municipal wastewater | 97% N, 98% P | 0.41 wt L−1 | 22 | Abou-Shanab et al. ( |
|
| Electric factory wastewater | 46% N, 100% P | 4.5 g L−1 | – | Su et al. ( |
|
| Synthetic wastewater | 95.55% P | – | 14.91 | Aravantinou et al. ( |
|
| Anaerobic digestion effluent | 89% N, 82.8% P | 155.3 mg L−1 day−1 | 24.9 | Cai et al. ( |
|
| Diluted digester effluent | 97% TN | 204.12 mg L−1 day−1 | 32 | Sheets ( |
|
| 50% municipal wastewater | – | 2.23 g L−1 | 59.9 | Jiang et al. ( |
|
| Mine wastewater | 97% | 0.8 g L−1 | 17 | Ji et al. ( |
|
| Municipal wastewater | – | 0.26 wt. L−1 | 19 | Abou-Shanab et al. ( |
|
| Treated domestic sewage | 60.02% N, 51.15% P | 1.88 g L−1 | 36.14 | Sydney et al. ( |
|
| Tertiary municipal wastewater | 100% | 0.31 g L−1 | 31 | Ji et al. ( |
|
| Synthetic wastewater | 94.92% P | – | 19.29 | Aravantinou et al. ( |
|
| Synthetic wastewater | 94.34% P | – | 6.93 | Aravantinou et al. ( |
A good review on the research before 2011 about the algal biofuel production using wastewater resources has been made by Pittman et al. (2011)