Literature DB >> 21218910

Spatial perception and adaptive sonar behavior.

Murat Aytekin1, Beatrice Mao, Cynthia F Moss.   

Abstract

Bat echolocation is a dynamic behavior that allows for real-time adaptations in the timing and spectro-temporal design of sonar signals in response to a particular task and environment. To enable detailed, quantitative analyses of adaptive sonar behavior, echolocation call design was investigated in big brown bats, trained to rest on a stationary platform and track a tethered mealworm that approached from a starting distance of about 170 cm in the presence of a stationary sonar distracter. The distracter was presented at different angular offsets and distances from the bat. The results of this study show that the distance and the angular offset of the distracter influence sonar vocalization parameters of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. Specifically, the bat adjusted its call duration to the closer of two objects, distracter or insect target, and the magnitude of the adjustment depended on the angular offset of the distracter. In contrast, the bat consistently adjusted its call rate to the distance of the insect, even when this target was positioned behind the distracter. The results hold implications for understanding spatial information processing and perception by echolocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21218910      PMCID: PMC3037775          DOI: 10.1121/1.3504707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Determining biosonar images using sparse representations.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Clutter interference and the integration time of echoes in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; E G Freedman; S B Stevenson; L Chen; T J Wohlgenant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  A Surlykke; C F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Clutter interference along the target range axis in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; S A Kick; A J Moffat; W M Masters; D Kon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The echolocation and hunting behavior of the bat, Pipistrellus kuhli.

Authors:  H U Schnitzler; E Kalko; L Miller; A Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Stabilization of perceived echo amplitudes in echolocating bats. II. The acoustic behavior of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, when tracking moving prey.

Authors:  D J Hartley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatial unmasking in the echolocating Big Brown Bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Susan Sümer; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Interpulse interval modulation by echolocating big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in different densities of obstacle clutter.

Authors:  Anthony E Petrites; Oliver S Eng; Donald S Mowlds; James A Simmons; Caroline M DeLong
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming.

Authors:  Chen Chiu; Wei Xian; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Active listening for spatial orientation in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Kari Bohn; Hannah Gilkenson; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive vocal behavior drives perception by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Chen Chiu; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) reveal diverse strategies for sonar target tracking in clutter.

Authors:  Beatrice Mao; Murat Aytekin; Gerald S Wilkinson; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Timing matters: sonar call groups facilitate target localization in bats.

Authors:  Ninad B Kothari; Melville J Wohlgemuth; Katrine Hulgard; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  It's not black or white-on the range of vision and echolocation in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Arjan Boonman; Yinon Bar-On; Noam Cvikel; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Sonar beam dynamics in leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Spike Train Similarity Space (SSIMS) Method Detects Effects of Obstacle Proximity and Experience on Temporal Patterning of Bat Biosonar.

Authors:  Alyssa W Accomando; Carlos E Vargas-Irwin; James A Simmons
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.