Literature DB >> 21216769

The eye dominates in guiding attention during simultaneous eye and hand movements.

Aarlenne Z Khan1, Joo-Hyun Song, Robert M McPeek.   

Abstract

Prior to the onset of a saccade or a reach, attention is directed to the goal of the upcoming movement. However, it remains unknown whether attentional resources are shared across effectors for simultaneous eye and hand movements. Using a 4-AFC shape discrimination task, we investigated attentional allocation during the planning of a saccade alone, reach alone, or combined saccade and reach to one of five peripheral locations. Target discrimination was better when the probe appeared at the goal of the impending movement than when it appeared elsewhere. However, discrimination performance at the movement goal was not better for combined eye-hand movements compared to either effector alone, suggesting a shared limited attentional resource rather than separate pools of effector-specific attention. To test which effector dominates in guiding attention, we then separated eye and hand movement goals in two conditions: (1) cued reach/fixed saccade--subjects made saccades to the same peripheral location throughout the block, while the reach goal was cued and (2) cued saccade/fixed reach--subjects made reaches to the same location, while the saccade goal was cued. For both conditions, discrimination performance was consistently better at the eye goal than the hand goal. This indicates that shared attentional resources are guided predominantly by the eye during the planning of eye and hand movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21216769      PMCID: PMC3141209          DOI: 10.1167/11.1.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  74 in total

1.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Space and attention in parietal cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 6.  The knowledge base of the oculomotor system.

Authors:  M F Land; S Furneaux
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades.

Authors:  E Kowler; E Anderson; B Dosher; E Blaser
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST.

Authors:  S Treue; J H Maunsell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Magnetic misreaching.

Authors:  D P Carey; R J Coleman; S Della Sala
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Neurophysiological evidence for a role of posterior parietal cortex in redirecting visual attention.

Authors:  M A Steinmetz; C Constantinidis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  19 in total

1.  Reach preparation enhances visual performance and appearance.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Bonnie M Lawrence; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Neural correlates of target selection for reaching movements in superior colliculus.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Allocation of attention for dissociated visual and motor goals.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Patrick Bédard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.

Authors:  Tobias Moehler; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Paradoxical benefits of dual-task contexts for visuomotor memory.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Patrick Bédard
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-10

6.  Long lasting attentional-context dependent visuomotor memory.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Patrick Bédard; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention.

Authors:  Gözde Şentürk; Adam S Greenberg; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Vision of the active limb impairs bimanual motor tracking in young and older adults.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Florian Van Halewyck; Sharissa H A Corporaal; Lina Willacker; Veerle Van Den Bergh; Iseult A M Beets; Oron Levin; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Disrupted Saccade Control in Chronic Cerebral Injury: Upper Motor Neuron-Like Disinhibition in the Ocular Motor System.

Authors:  John-Ross Rizzo; Todd E Hudson; Andrew Abdou; Yvonne W Lui; Janet C Rucker; Preeti Raghavan; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Eye Control Deficits Coupled to Hand Control Deficits: Eye-Hand Incoordination in Chronic Cerebral Injury.

Authors:  John-Ross Rizzo; James K Fung; Maryam Hosseini; Azadeh Shafieesabet; Edmond Ahdoot; Rosa M Pasculli; Janet C Rucker; Preeti Raghavan; Michael S Landy; Todd E Hudson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.