Literature DB >> 21210144

If it's hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments.

Gesine Dreisbach1, Rico Fischer.   

Abstract

Experiencing difficulties during information processing can either be used as signal for the increased need of cognitive effort ("try harder"), or as avoidance signal for future action selection ("avoid and switch"). These alternative ideas are currently reflected in two seemingly opposing theories of anterior cingulate cortex function, namely the conflict monitoring versus the outcome evaluation account. Botvinick (2007) recently suggested that both positions might converge on the detection of aversive signals. Here, we will show that low perceptual fluency, which is known to evoke negative affective reactions, triggers the mobilization of cognitive effort even in the absence of response conflicts. More precisely, in three experiments effort adjustments in reaction to fluency manipulations as indicated by significant interactions of Fluency( N ) × Fluency(N-1) were found. It follows that an aversive signal (here: low fluency) is not only used for effort prediction but also for effort adjustments.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21210144     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0319-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  23 in total

1.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh; Paul Laurey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.

Authors:  John G Kerns; Jonathan D Cohen; Angus W MacDonald; Raymond Y Cho; V Andrew Stenger; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Rico Fischer; Maja Dshemuchadse; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: two sources of sequential modulations.

Authors:  Cağlar Akçay; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

Review 5.  Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Conflict-triggered goal shielding: response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues.

Authors:  Thomas Goschke; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-01

7.  If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation.

Authors:  Hyunjin Song; Norbert Schwarz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10

8.  The microgenesis of action-effect binding.

Authors:  Ilona B Dutzi; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-09-23

9.  Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control.

Authors:  Henk van Steenbergen; Guido P H Band; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11-09

10.  The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26
View more
  16 in total

1.  Cognitive effort is modulated outside of the explicit awareness of conflict frequency: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Robert Langner; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Conflict and disfluency as aversive signals: context-specific processing adjustments are modulated by affective location associations.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Anna-Lena Reindl; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-08

4.  Dynamic adjustments in working memory in the face of affective interference.

Authors:  J E Witkin; A P Zanesco; E Denkova; A P Jha
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

5.  Bad after bad is good: previous trial disfluency reduces interference promoted by incongruence.

Authors:  Gonçalo A Oliveira; Miguel Remondes; Teresa Garcia-Marques
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  The role of affect and reward in the conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation.

Authors:  Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-28

8.  Mental fatigue modulates dynamic adaptation to perceptual demand in speeded detection.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff; Michael B Steinborn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Conflicts as aversive signals: conflict priming increases negative judgments for neutral stimuli.

Authors:  Julia Fritz; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.526

10.  Restoration of Attention by Rest in a Multitasking World: Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Evidence.

Authors:  Frank Schumann; Michael B Steinborn; Jens Kürten; Liyu Cao; Barbara Friederike Händel; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.