Literature DB >> 18181788

Conflict-triggered goal shielding: response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues.

Thomas Goschke1, Gesine Dreisbach.   

Abstract

Action control in a changing environment requires that one shield current goals from distracting information (goal shielding) and at the same time monitor the environment for potentially significant stimuli that may afford a goal switch (background monitoring). Response conflicts modulate the balance between goal shielding and background monitoring, as indicated by reduced susceptibility to interference after response conflicts. Such conflict-adaptation effects have been attributed to enhanced recruitment of cognitive control on trials following conflicts. Here we show that conflict triggers increased goal shielding on the conflict trial itself. Subjects performed a spatial compatibility task during which they had to notice rare prospective memory cues. Such cues were overlooked more often on conflict trials than on nonconflict trials, a result indicating that shielding of the current goal and inhibition of distractors were increased on the current trial when it involved a response conflict. Thus, evidence for enhanced recruitment of control following conflict may partly reflect aftereffects of goal shielding on the conflict trial itself.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181788     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02042.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  19 in total

1.  If it's hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-01-06

2.  Neural conflict-control mechanisms improve memory for target stimuli.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Maya De Belder; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Keep it cool: temperature priming effect on cognitive control.

Authors:  Eliran Halali; Nachshon Meiran; Idit Shalev
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-24

4.  Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Klaus Willmes; Anjan Chatterjee; Simon B Eickhoff; Walter Sturm
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-10

5.  Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Michael K Scullin; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Cognitive control in action: Tracking the dynamics of rule switching in 5- to 8-year-olds and adults.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song; David M Sobel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-04-18

7.  Task intentions and their implementation into actions: cognitive control from adolescence to middle adulthood.

Authors:  Edita Poljac; Rianne Haartsen; Renske van der Cruijsen; Andrea Kiesel; Ervin Poljac
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-10-13

8.  Conflict-triggered top-down control: default mode, last resort, or no such thing?

Authors:  Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Meta-control of the exploration-exploitation dilemma emerges from probabilistic inference over a hierarchy of time scales.

Authors:  Dimitrije Marković; Thomas Goschke; Stefan J Kiebel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  When planning results in loss of control: intention-based reflexivity and working-memory.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.