Literature DB >> 21044093

The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.

Stefan Scherbaum1, Rico Fischer, Maja Dshemuchadse, Thomas Goschke.   

Abstract

A central topic in the cognitive sciences is how cognitive control is adapted flexibly to changing task demands. Conflict monitoring theory originally proposed conflict triggered adjustments of cognitive control after a conflict trial to improve subsequent performance. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that readjustments of cognitive control occur continuously within a conflict trial itself. Using frequency tagged electroencephalogram in a flanker task, we traced the allocation of attention to target and distracter stimuli. We found evidence for a conflict-triggered within-trial contrast enhancement dissociating target and distracters. This contrast enhancement vanished for consecutive trials with constant tagging frequencies, indicating that trial-to-trial conflict adaptation effects may, at least partly, be the product of interacting processes serving conflict resolution within trials.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044093     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  28 in total

1.  Working memory demands modulate cognitive control in the Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  If it's hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-01-06

3.  The time course of cognitive control implementation.

Authors:  Clio Janssens; Esther De Loof; Gilles Pourtois; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

4.  Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.

Authors:  Magali Kreutzfeldt; Denise N Stephan; Klaus Willmes; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.

Authors:  W Duthoo; E L Abrahamse; S Braem; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07

6.  Neural conflict-control mechanisms improve memory for target stimuli.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Maya De Belder; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Quantifying mechanisms of cognition with an experiment and modeling ecosystem.

Authors:  Emily R Weichart; Kevin P Darby; Adam W Fenton; Brandon G Jacques; Ryan P Kirkpatrick; Brandon M Turner; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-18

8.  Layers of latent effects in cognitive control: An EEG investigation.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-03-01

9.  Psychometrics of the continuous mind: Measuring cognitive sub-processes via mouse tracking.

Authors:  Stefan Scherbaum; Maja Dshemuchadse
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

10.  Is conflict adaptation due to active regulation or passive carry-over? Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jason Hubbard; David Kuhns; Theo A J Schäfer; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.