Literature DB >> 21208071

Craniofacial growth of Class III subjects six to sixteen years of age.

Sara M Wolfe1, Eustaquio Araujo, Rolf G Behrents, Peter H Buschang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the mixed-longitudinal craniofacial growth of untreated, white, Class III subjects 6 to 16 years of age.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial cephalograms of 19 females and 23 males with Class III malocclusion were evaluated at three time points (6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 years of age). A similar number of Class I controls were randomly selected and matched for age and sex. The cephalograms were traced and digitized, and 20 variables were evaluated. Growth patterns were quantified, and class and sex differences were evaluated using multi-level analyses.
RESULTS: In comparison with Class I subjects, Class III subjects had significantly (P ≤ .05) larger mandibular plane angles, gonial angles, mandibular ramus heights, mandibular corpus lengths, and SNB angles, with differences that were maintained between 6 and 16 years of age. Maxillary lengths and ANB angles were significantly smaller and remained smaller in Class III subjects than in Class I subjects. Lower face height, maxillary-mandibular differential, and mandibular body length were also significantly larger and increased significantly more between 6 and 16 years of age in Class III subjects. The WITS appraisal was significantly smaller in Class III subjects and decreased significantly more over time. Most linear measures showed significant sex differences favoring males; the angular measures and anteroposterior (AP) maxillomandibular relationships showed no sex differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The AP maxillomandibular relationship of Class III subjects worsens over time. AP discrepancies are primarily due to excessive mandibular growth, which produces a protrusive, hyperdivergent phenotype. The AP discrepancies of males are larger than those of females, with differences increasing over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21208071      PMCID: PMC8925254          DOI: 10.2319/051010-252.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  18 in total

1.  Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.

Authors:  K E Macdonald; A J Kapust; P K Turley
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  THE PREVALENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF MALOCCLUSION AMONG SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN UPSTATE NEW YORK.

Authors:  D B AST; J P CARLOS; N C CONS
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1965-06

3.  A dentofacial study of male students at the University of Michigan in the physical hardening program.

Authors:  R E HUBER; J W REYNOLDS
Journal:  Am J Orthod Oral Surg       Date:  1946-01

4.  The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.

Authors:  A Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1975-02

5.  Multilevel modelling of longitudinal cephalometric data explained for orthodontists.

Authors:  J B Hoeksma; M C van der Beek
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey.

Authors:  W R Proffit; H W Fields; L J Moray
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1998

7.  Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.

Authors:  E C Guyer; E E Ellis; J A McNamara; R G Behrents
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  A Jacobson; W G Evans; C B Preston; P L Sadowsky
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1974-08

9.  A method of cephalometric evaluation.

Authors:  J A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-12

10.  The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  J M Battagel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  6 in total

1.  Variation in timing, duration, intensity, and direction of adolescent growth in the mandible, maxilla, and cranial base: the Fels longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ramzi W Nahhas; Manish Valiathan; Richard J Sherwood
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Prevalence of maxillary canine impaction in skeletal Class III malocclusions compared to Class I malocclusions.

Authors:  Gabriele Di Carlo; Matteo Saccucci; Valeria Luzzi; Gaetano Ierardo; Iole Vozza; Gian-Luca Sfasciotti; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Effect of face mask therapy on mandibular rotation considering initial and final vertical growth pattern: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Liseth Salazar; Melissa Piedrahita; Emery Álvarez; Adriana Santamaría; Ruben Manrique; Osmir Batista Oliveira Junior
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-06-13

4.  Early Treatment of Anterior Crossbite with Eruption Guidance Appliance: A Case Report.

Authors:  Marianna Pellegrino; Silvia Caruso; Tiziana Cantile; Gioacchino Pellegrino; Gianmaria Fabrizio Ferrazzano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships.

Authors:  Susan N Al-Khateeb; Emad F Al Maaitah; Elham S Abu Alhaija; Serene A Badran
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Analysis of pretreatment factors associated with stability in early class III treatment.

Authors:  Yasuko Inoue; Toru Deguchi; James K Hartsfield; Wakako Tome; Noriyuki Kitai
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.