Literature DB >> 10393575

Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.

K E Macdonald1, A J Kapust, P K Turley.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the cephalometric changes that occurred during and after the correction of Class III malocclusion. The records of 24 Class III patients treated with a banded expansion appliance and custom facemask were compared with 24 Class I and 27 Class III untreated controls. Cephalometric means were calculated for the annualized data and compared univariately with unpaired t tests to determine significant differences. Treatment results showed more convexity of the facial profile from anterior displacement and downward and backward rotation of the maxilla and clockwise rotation of the mandible. The maxillary teeth moved forward while the lower incisors retruded. Postprotraction results showed the maxilla did not relapse after treatment but grew anteriorly similar to the Class III controls but less than the Class I controls. Mandibular growth was similar for the treatment and control groups. Dental changes compensated for decreasing overjet whereas the soft tissue profile showed no significant posttreatment changes. Results in the intercontrol comparison showed the Class III controls had significantly less forward movement of A-point and greater forward movement of the mandible than Class I controls. Because of these differences using a Class I control group to compare to a Class III treatment group will tend to underestimate the treatment effects and overestimate posttreatment changes. Overcorrection of the Class III malocclusion is recommended to compensate for postprotraction growth deficiency of the maxilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10393575     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70298-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  25 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

Authors:  F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Hee-Jong Kwak; Hae-Jin Park; Yoon-Ji Kim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  3D soft tissue changes in facial morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate and class III mal occlusion under therapy with rapid maxillary expansion and delaire facemask.

Authors:  Claudia Sade Hoefert; Margit Bacher; Tina Herberts; Michael Krimmel; Siegmar Reinert; Gernot Göz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Runzhi Guo; Liyu Hou; Zhen Fu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: A predictor of maxillary protraction? Part I - A classification method.

Authors:  F Angelieri; L Franchi; L H S Cevidanes; C T Hino; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Reverse Forsus vs. facemask/rapid palatal expansion appliances in growing subjects with mild class III malocclusions : A randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Yavan; Aysegul Gulec; Metin Orhan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Yuan Shu Ge; Jin Liu; Lin Chen; Jian Li Han; Xin Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.