Literature DB >> 1054214

The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.

A Jacobson.   

Abstract

The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony is a simple method whereby the severity or degree of anteroposterior jaw dysplasia may be measured on a lateral cephalometic head film. The method entails drawing perpendiculars from points A and B on the maxilla and mandible, respectively, onto the occlusal plane. The points of contact of the perpendiculars onto the occlusal plane are labeled AO and BO, respectively. In a sample of twenty-one male and twenty-five female adults selected on the basis of excellence of occlusion, it was found, on the average, that in females points AO and BO coincided and in males point BO was located 1 mm. ahead of point AO. In skeltal Class II jaw dysplasias, point BO would be positioned well behind point AO (positive reading), whereas in Class III skeltal jaw disharmonies, the "Wits" reading would be negative, that is, with point BO ahead of point AO. The advantages of the "Wits" appraisal over that of the conventional ANB angle reading are illustrated and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1054214     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  87 in total

1.  [A critical analysis of the SNA, SNB and ANB angles in assessing orthodontic treatments].

Authors:  H Pancherz; B Sack
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1990-10

2.  Skelate changes induced by orthodontic in class II division 1 by CBCT: a long-term follow-up prospective study.

Authors:  Shuofei Zhang; Weiting Chen; Sheng Ding; Hongwei Han; Zhou Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Evaluation of orthodontic treatment success in patients with pronounced Angle Class III.

Authors:  R Angermann; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Björn Ludwig; Julia Spindler; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  P Aparna; Dilip N Kumar; Mandav Prasad; Naveen Shamnur; Arun Kumar G; Sridhar K R; Gopal Krishna B R; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

6.  The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  Jose C Castillo; Grace Gianneschi; Demyana Azer; Amornrut Manosudprasit; Arshan Haghi; Neetu Bansal; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Mohamed I Masoud
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Predictability and Reliability of Different Anterio-Posterior Skeletal Discrepancy Indicators in Different Age Groups - A Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Rana Tiwari; Tarulatha R Shyagali; Abhishek Gupta; Rishi Joshi; Anil Tiwari; Priyank Sen
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

8.  Reply.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Ideal parameter to assess efficacy of fixed functional appliance: angular or linear?

Authors:  Anjana Devi; Bhadrinath Srinivasan; Sridevi Padmanabhan
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Craniofacial cephalometric morphologies in different cleft types: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 212 patients.

Authors:  Ana López-Giménez; Javier Silvestre-Rangil; Francisco-Javier Silvestre; Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.