Literature DB >> 21208068

The relationship between the ABO discrepancy index and treatment duration in a graduate orthodontic clinic.

Laura D Parrish1, W Eugene Roberts, Gerardo Maupome, Kelton T Stewart, Robert W Bandy, Katherine S Kula.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is no relationship between the components of the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) discrepancy index (DI) and duration of orthodontic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 732 patient records with permanent dentition was performed. Pretreatment radiographs and casts were used to determine the DI score. Other data collected were total treatment duration, age, sex, ethnicity, and the date fixed appliances were removed. Reliability tests showed substantial agreement between examiners (Cohen's kappa 0.68-0.94). Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess the association between the DI scores and length of treatment. A multiple variable regression analysis was used to determine which variables predict treatment duration (P < .05 significant).
RESULTS: There was a significant association between the DI and treatment duration. There was a significant multivariate association for DI components (occlusions, crowding, overjet, cephalometrics, overbite, lateral open bite, and tooth transposition) and treatment duration.
CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis was rejected. This retrospective study of university clinical records showed that the average increase in treatment duration was about 11 days for each point increase in total DI score. Treatment duration was differentially increased by various components of the DI: approximately 6.5 months for tooth transposition; approximately 1 month for crowding, overjet, or overbite; approximately 3 weeks for occlusion discrepancies; approximately 2 weeks for lateral open bite; and approximately 5 days for cephalometric discrepancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21208068      PMCID: PMC8925256          DOI: 10.2319/062210-341.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  22 in total

1.  The time-factor in orthodontics: what influences the duration of treatments in National Health Service practices?

Authors:  E A Turbill; S Richmond; J L Wright
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.383

2.  Orthodontic process and outcome: efficacy studies--strategies for developing process and outcome measures: a new era in orthodontics.

Authors:  K W Vig; R Weyant; D Vayda; K O'Brien; E Bennett
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  1998-11

3.  The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity.

Authors:  Thomas J Cangialosi; Michael L Riolo; S Ed Owens; Vance J Dykhouse; Allen H Moffitt; John E Grubb; Peter M Greco; Jeryl D English; R Don James
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.

Authors:  Christy Q Vu; W Eugene Roberts; James K Hartsfield; Susan Ofner
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  The association of malocclusion complexity and orthodontic treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan M Pulfer; Carl T Drake; Gerardo Maupome; George J Eckert; W Eugene Roberts
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  F R Beckwith; R J Ackerman; C M Cobb; D E Tira
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Discrepancy index relative to age, sex, and the probability of completing treatment by one resident in a 2-year graduate orthodontics program.

Authors:  Sean M Schafer; Gerardo Maupome; George J Eckert; W Eugene Roberts
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program.

Authors:  Yuliya B Pinskaya; Tsung-Ju Hsieh; W Eugene Roberts; James K Hartsfield
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The duration of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  D F Fink; R J Smith
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices.

Authors:  P S Vig; J A Weintraub; C Brown; C J Kowalski
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  8 in total

1.  Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.

Authors:  Eric Lin; Katie Julien; Matthew Kesterke; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Clinical outcomes of lingual fully customized vs labial straight wire systems : Assessment based on American Board of Orthodontics criteria.

Authors:  Fadi Ata-Ali; Javier Ata-Ali; Alicia Lanuza-Garcia; Marcela Ferrer-Molina; Maria Melo; Eliseo Plasencia
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Factors influencing treatment efficiency.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Treatment Time of Class II Malocclusion, with and without Mandibular Crowding, Treated with Four Premolar Extractions: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Lucas Nunes Bastos Curty Silva; Marcelo Vinicius Valerio; Vinicius Laranjeira; Ana Niederberger; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-06

5.  Assessment of clinical outcomes of Roth and MBT bracket prescription using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.

Authors:  Mahesh Jain; Joseph Varghese; Rohan Mascarenhas; Subraya Mogra; Siddarth Shetty; Nidhi Dhakar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-07

6.  Lingual orthodontic treatment duration: performance of two different completely customized multi-bracket appliances (Incognito and WIN) in groups with different treatment complexities.

Authors:  Michael Knösel; Elisabeth Klang; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Effects of High Frequency Acceleration Device on Aligner Treatment-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Thomas S Shipley
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-12

8.  Orthodontic Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes in an Educational Setting.

Authors:  T Al-Jewair; V Ryan; S Warunek
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-04-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.