Literature DB >> 10321143

Orthodontic process and outcome: efficacy studies--strategies for developing process and outcome measures: a new era in orthodontics.

K W Vig1, R Weyant, D Vayda, K O'Brien, E Bennett.   

Abstract

The development of process and outcome measures in orthodontics lends itself to retrospective clinical studies. Once valid and reliable measures have been tested, prospective studies may utilize these measures to assess the quality of orthodontic treatment outcome and the duration and process of treatment. The findings from two retrospective studies comparing the quality of outcome using the peer assessment rating (PAR) occlusal index and duration of treatment are reported. Class I and Class II treatment comparisons indicate the duration of treatment time is increased on average 5 months in Class II, division 1 patients. In the second study, the effect of extraction/non-extraction treatment in a sample that included all types of malocclusion indicates that, on average, treatment time is increased by approximately 5 months when extractions are included as part of the orthodontic treatment plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10321143     DOI: 10.1111/ocr.1998.1.2.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthod Res        ISSN: 1397-5927


  6 in total

1.  Which one closes extraction spaces faster: en masse retraction or two-step retraction? A randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia Pigato Schneider; Ki Beom Kim; André da Costa Monini; Ary Dos Santos-Pinto; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Is there a relationship between mandibular cortical bone thickness and orthodontic treatment time?

Authors:  Melissa Landin-Ramos; Sumit Yadav; Vaibhav Gandhi; Madhur Upadhyay; Aditya Tadinada
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Frequency of premolar teeth extractions for orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Anisha Mahtani; Ravindra Kumar Jain
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2020-12-31

4.  Did the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic affect orthodontic treatment outcomes? A clinical evaluation using the objective grading system and Peer Assessment Rating index.

Authors:  Pamir Meriç; Julia Naoumova
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  The relationship between the ABO discrepancy index and treatment duration in a graduate orthodontic clinic.

Authors:  Laura D Parrish; W Eugene Roberts; Gerardo Maupome; Kelton T Stewart; Robert W Bandy; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Factors influencing treatment efficiency.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.