Literature DB >> 18174061

Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.

Christy Q Vu1, W Eugene Roberts, James K Hartsfield, Susan Ofner.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinical cases completed by the Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD) graduating orthodontic classes of 2004, 2005, and 2006 were assessed to determine factors that affect orthodontic treatment duration.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 455 consecutively finished patients who received comprehensive treatment in the full permanent dentition. They included optimally finished and prematurely terminated (early debond) patients. The American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) discrepancy index (DI) was used to evaluate the severity of the pretreatment malocclusion. A specifically designed treatment complexity index (TCI) was used to evaluate complexity based on treatment modalities. The ABO objective grading system (OGS) and the IUSD comprehensive clinical assessment (CCA) were used to evaluate the clinical outcome for all patients.
RESULTS: The average treatment duration was 29 months. The mean DI, OGS, and CCA scores were 15.30, 23.34, and 4.48, respectively. Increased treatment length was associated with 0.022-in slot size brackets, percent of treatment spent in nickel-titanium wires, Class II malocclusion, increased DI score, and increased TCI score. In evaluating outcomes for 2004 through 2006, there was no significant relationship between treatment duration and clinical outcome as measured by the OGS and CCA scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The DI and TCI are sensitive prospective indicators of treatment duration. After the introduction of a rigorous clinical protocol for controlling poor outcomes, because of patients exceeding predicted treatment times, the clinical results for this sample are independent of treatment duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18174061     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  Duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescents and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Allen Abbing; Vasiliki Koretsi; Theodore Eliades; Spyridon N Papageorgiou
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.750

2.  Clinical outcomes of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch bracket slot using the ABO objective grading system.

Authors:  David A Detterline; Serkis C Isikbay; Edward J Brizendine; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy.

Authors:  Timothy J Alford; W Eugene Roberts; James K Hartsfield; George J Eckert; Ronald J Snyder
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The relationship between the ABO discrepancy index and treatment duration in a graduate orthodontic clinic.

Authors:  Laura D Parrish; W Eugene Roberts; Gerardo Maupome; Kelton T Stewart; Robert W Bandy; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Assessment of clinical outcomes of Roth and MBT bracket prescription using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.

Authors:  Mahesh Jain; Joseph Varghese; Rohan Mascarenhas; Subraya Mogra; Siddarth Shetty; Nidhi Dhakar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-07

6.  Evaluation of treatment outcomes in a 3 years post-graduate orthodontic program using the peer assessment rating (par).

Authors:  Paloma González-Gil-de-Bernabé; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José M Montiel-Company; José L Gandía-Franco
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 7.  New therapeutic modalities to modulate orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Ildeu Andrade; Ana Beatriz dos Santos Sousa; Gabriela Gonçalves da Silva
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Lívia Monteiro Bichara; Mônica Lídia Castro de Aragón; Gustavo Antônio Martins Brandão; David Normando
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Treatment outcome differences between pass and fail scores and correlation between cephalometric changes and cast-radiograph evaluation of the American Board of Orthodontics.

Authors:  Siew Peng Neoh; Chulaluk Komoltri; Nita Viwattanatipa
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-11-15

10.  Relationship between pretreatment case complexity and orthodontic clinical outcomes determined by the American Board of Orthodontics criteria.

Authors:  Hatice Akinci Cansunar; Tancan Uysal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.