Literature DB >> 15014402

The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity.

Thomas J Cangialosi1, Michael L Riolo, S Ed Owens, Vance J Dykhouse, Allen H Moffitt, John E Grubb, Peter M Greco, Jeryl D English, R Don James.   

Abstract

A criterion for determining the acceptability of a case presented for the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Phase III clinical examination is case difficulty. Case difficulty can often be subjective; however, it is related to case complexity, which can be quantifiable. Over the past 5 years, the ABO has developed and field-tested a discrepancy index, made up of various clinical entities that are measurable and have generally accepted norms. These entities summarize the clinical features of a patient's condition with a quantifiable, objective list of target disorders that represent the common elements of an orthodontic diagnosis: overjet, overbite, anterior open bite, lateral open bite, crowding, occlusion, lingual posterior crossbite, buccal posterior crossbite, ANB angle, IMPA, and SN-GoGn angle. The greater the number of these conditions in a patient, the greater the complexity and the greater the challenge to the orthodontist. The ABO is considering several options for applying the discrepancy index to the Phase III clinical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014402     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  21 in total

1.  Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol.

Authors:  Alvaro Carvajal-Flórez; Diana María Barbosa-Lis; Oscar Arturo Zapata-Noreña; Julissa Andrea Marín-Velásquez; Sergio Andrés Afanador-Bayona
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

2.  Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions.

Authors:  Alissa F Borda; Judah S Garfinkle; David A Covell; Mansen Wang; Larry Doyle; Christine M Sedgley
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.

Authors:  Eric Lin; Katie Julien; Matthew Kesterke; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Clinical outcomes of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch bracket slot using the ABO objective grading system.

Authors:  David A Detterline; Serkis C Isikbay; Edward J Brizendine; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy.

Authors:  Timothy J Alford; W Eugene Roberts; James K Hartsfield; George J Eckert; Ronald J Snyder
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  The relationship between the ABO discrepancy index and treatment duration in a graduate orthodontic clinic.

Authors:  Laura D Parrish; W Eugene Roberts; Gerardo Maupome; Kelton T Stewart; Robert W Bandy; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of effectiveness and stability of aligner treatments using the Peer Assessment Rating Index.

Authors:  Isabelle Graf; Carolin Puppe; Jörg Schwarze; Karolin Höfer; Hildegard Christ; Bert Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Outcome assessment of lingual and labial appliances compared with cephalometric analysis, peer assessment rating, and objective grading system in Angle Class II extraction cases.

Authors:  Toru Deguchi; Fumie Terao; Tomo Aonuma; Tomoki Kataoka; Yasuyo Sugawara; Takashi Yamashiro; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Factors influencing treatment efficiency.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluating the Correlation between Overjet and Skeletal Parameters Using DVT.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Chiara Sgarbanti; Antonio Guarneri; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.