Literature DB >> 21203742

3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire--psychometric properties and predictive validity.

William S Shaw1, Silje Endresen Reme, Steven J Linton, Yueng-Hsiang Huang, Glenn Pransky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 19-item return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) scale is a new self-report measure intended to assess workers' beliefs of their current ability to resume normal job responsibilities following pain onset. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factor structure, internal consistency, and predictive and concurrent validity of RTWSE-19 among workers with acute low-back pain.
METHODS: Patients (N=399, 59% male, mean age 37 years) consulting for acute, work-related low-back pain completed an original 28-item version of the new scale along with concurrent measures of pain, functional limitation, activity avoidance, workplace physical demands, and pain catastrophizing. The assessment was repeated at visit 2, and work limitations and duration of sickness absence were assessed by questionnaire at 3-month follow-up. Exploratory factor analysis (principal component analysis with varimax rotation) was used to assess content validity of the scale, and scores were compared to concurrent pain measures and with disability outcomes at 3 months.
RESULTS: The full response range (1-10) was utilized on all 28 items, and there were no ceiling or floor effects. Mean item scores ranged from 4.9 ("reducing physical workload") to 8.3 ("describing injury to supervisor"). The exploratory factor analysis supported three underlying factors (eigenvalue >1.0): (i) meeting job demands; (ii) modifying job tasks; and (iii) communicating needs to others. Internal consistency (alpha) for the three scales were 0.98, 0.92, and 0.81 respectively. At visit 2, self-efficacy scores improved for "meeting job demands" and "modifying job tasks", but not for "communicating needs to others". After controlling for pain and functional limitation, both sickness absence and persistent work limitations were predicted by self-efficacy assessed at visit 2 (P<0.05), but self-efficacy assessed at visit 1 did not predict sickness absence.
CONCLUSIONS: The RTWSE-19 is a new measure with adequate reliability and validity to measure the confidence of workers to meet job demands, modify job tasks, and communicate needs to co-workers and supervisors. When assessed 1-2 weeks after pain onset, the scale is predictive of disability outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21203742     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  32 in total

1.  Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain.

Authors:  Silje Endresen Reme; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Mary Jane Woiszwillo; Glenn Pransky; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

2.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

3.  Predicting improvement of functioning in disability claimants.

Authors:  K Nieuwenhuijsen; L R Cornelius; M R de Boer; J W Groothoff; M H W Frings-Dresen; J J L van der Klink; S Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Return-to-Work Outcomes for Workers with Psychological or Upper-Body Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Oliver Black; Tessa Keegel; Malcolm R Sim; Alexander Collie; Peter Smith
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03

5.  Expectations for Return to Work After Workplace Injuries: The Relationship Between Estimated Time to Return to Work and Estimate Accuracy.

Authors:  Amanda Ellen Young; Elyssa Besen; Joanna Willetts
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-12

6.  Identifying work ability promoting factors for home care aides and assistant nurses.

Authors:  Agneta Larsson; Lena Karlqvist; Mats Westerberg; Gunvor Gard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Measurement Properties of the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy Scale in Workers with Shoulder Injuries.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Cathryn Edmonds; Tukata Lin; Rachel Davies; Stefanie Chau
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Association between illness perceptions and return-to-work expectations in workers with common mental health symptoms.

Authors:  Camilla Løvvik; Simon Øverland; Mari Hysing; Elizabeth Broadbent; Silje E Reme
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

9.  A prospective study of the association between the readiness for return to work scale and future work participation in Norway.

Authors:  Tore N Braathen; Søren Brage; Gunnar Tellnes; Oyeflaten Irene; Jensen Chris; Monica Eftedal
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

10.  Perceptions of clinical support for employed breast cancer survivors managing work and health challenges.

Authors:  Alicia G Dugan; Ragan E Decker; Sara Namazi; Jennifer M Cavallari; Keith M Bellizzi; Thomas O Blank; Ellen A Dornelas; Susan H Tannenbaum; William S Shaw; Helen Swede; Andrew L Salner
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.