Literature DB >> 22236253

Identifying work ability promoting factors for home care aides and assistant nurses.

Agneta Larsson1, Lena Karlqvist, Mats Westerberg, Gunvor Gard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In workplace health promotion, all potential resources needs to be taken into consideration, not only factors relating to the absence of injury and the physical health of the workers, but also psychological aspects. A dynamic balance between the resources of the individual employees and the demands of work is an important prerequisite. In the home care services, there is a noticeable trend towards increased psychosocial strain on employees at work. There are a high frequency of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and injuries, and a low prevalence of sustainable work ability. The aim of this research was to identify factors promoting work ability and self-efficacy in care aides and assistant nurses within home care services.
METHODS: This study is based on cross-sectional data collected in a municipality in northern Sweden. Care aides (n = 58) and assistant nurses (n = 79) replied to a self-administered questionnaire (response rate 46%). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed to assess the influence of several independent variables on self-efficacy (model 1) and work ability (model 2) for care aides and assistant nurses separately.
RESULTS: Perceptions of personal safety, self-efficacy and musculoskeletal wellbeing contributed to work ability for assistant nurses (R2adj of 0.36, p < 0.001), while for care aides, the safety climate, seniority and age contributed to work ability (R2adj of 0.29, p = 0.001). Self-efficacy was associated with the safety climate and the physical demands of the job in both professions (R2adj of 0.24, p = 0.003 for care aides), and also by sex and age for the assistant nurses (R2adj of 0.31, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The intermediate factors contributed differently to work ability in the two professions. Self-efficacy, personal safety and musculoskeletal wellbeing were important for the assistant nurses, while the work ability of the care aides was associated with the safety climate, but also with the non-changeable factors age and seniority. All these factors are important to acknowledge in practice and in further research. Proactive workplace interventions need to focus on potentially modifiable factors such as self-efficacy, safety climate, physical job demands and musculoskeletal wellbeing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22236253      PMCID: PMC3292971          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  29 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of peak and cumulative spinal loads during simulated patient-handling activities: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial to prevent lift and transfer injury of health care workers.

Authors:  D Daynard; A Yassi; J E Cooper; R Tate; R Norman; R Wells
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Health promotion in the workplace: framing the concept; reviewing the evidence.

Authors:  M Shain; D M Kramer
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Making sense of safety.

Authors:  P Nilsen; D S Hudson; A Kullberg; T Timpka; R Ekman; K Lindqvist
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 4.  Salutogenesis.

Authors:  Bengt Lindström; Monica Eriksson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

6.  Assistant nurses working in care of older people: associations with sustainable work ability.

Authors:  Karin M Hägglund; Christer Helsing; Hélène Sandmark
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2010-08-31

Review 7.  A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part II).

Authors:  Ray Marks; John P Allegrante; Kate Lorig
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2005-04

8.  Health promotion by social cognitive means.

Authors:  Albert Bandura
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2004-04

9.  Excessive physical demands in modern worklife and characteristics of work and living conditions of persons at risk.

Authors:  Lena K Karlqvist; Annika Härenstam; Ola Leijon; Patrik Schéele
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Reports of work related musculoskeletal injury among home care service workers compared with nursery school workers and the general population of employed women in Sweden.

Authors:  Y Ono; M Lagerström; M Hagberg; A Lindén; B Malker
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  9 in total

1.  Surgeons' work ability and performance in surgical care: relations between organisational predictors, work engagement and work ability.

Authors:  Stefanie Mache; Gerhard Danzer; Burghard F Klapp; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  [Conservative treatment of chronic tendinopathies].

Authors:  P Diehl; H Gollwitzer; J Schauwecker; T Tischer; L Gerdesmeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Work, diabetes and obesity: a seven year follow-up study among Danish health care workers.

Authors:  Kjeld Poulsen; Bryan Cleal; Thomas Clausen; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Aging and Work Ability: The Moderating Role of Job and Personal Resources.

Authors:  Daniela Converso; Ilaria Sottimano; Gloria Guidetti; Barbara Loera; Michela Cortini; Sara Viotti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-10

5.  "Blue flags", development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - a validation study in primary care.

Authors:  Charlotte Post Sennehed; Gunvor Gard; Sara Holmberg; Kjerstin Stigmar; Malin Forsbrand; Birgitta Grahn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Teamwork and Safety Climate in Homecare: A Mixed Method Study.

Authors:  Agneta Larsson; Mats Westerberg; Lena Karlqvist; Gunvor Gard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Work motivation and occupational self-efficacy belief to continue working among ageing home care nurses: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Stina Wallin; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund; Lisbeth Fagerström
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-01-27

8.  The influence of perceived stress and musculoskeletal pain on work performance and work ability in Swedish health care workers.

Authors:  A Lindegård; P Larsman; E Hadzibajramovic; G Ahlborg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Early workplace dialogue in physiotherapy practice improved work ability at 1-year follow-up-WorkUp, a randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Charlotte P Sennehed; Sara Holmberg; Iben Axén; Kjerstin Stigmar; Malin Forsbrand; Ingemar F Petersson; Birgitta Grahn
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.926

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.