Literature DB >> 30787501

Measurement Properties of the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy Scale in Workers with Shoulder Injuries.

Helen Razmjou1,2,3, Cathryn Edmonds1,4, Tukata Lin1,4, Rachel Davies1,4, Stefanie Chau1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the measurement properties of the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy (RTWSE) scale in injured Canadian workers. Method: We assessed internal consistency, construct-convergent, and known-groups validity of the RTWSE scale's total score and the pain management and re-injury self-efficacy (PRSE), supervisor support self-efficacy (SSE), and coworkers support self-efficacy (CWSE) domains in workers who had participated in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Disability was measured by using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale. Spearman's ρ, odds ratios, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to examine the strength of the associations.
Results: The data of 57 injured workers (43 men [75%], mean age 52 [11] y) were used for analysis. Internal consistency of the domains was satisfactory, with Cronbach's αs of 0.81, 0.87, and 0.92 for the CWSE, PRSE, and SSE, respectively. The PRSE domain correlated with the DASH (r = 0.39) and relevant domains of the RTWSE scale (rs = 0.47-0.78). The PRSE was able to differentiate between working and non-working people (AUC = 0.72). Satisfaction with the actual support received at work and overall job satisfaction correlated significantly with the total score and CWSE and SSE domains (AUCs ≥ 0.70). Conclusions: The RTWSE showed satisfactory internal consistency and construct convergent and known-groups validity in workers with shoulder injuries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficacité personnelle; reproducibility of results; reproductibilité des résultats; retour au travail; return-to-work; self-efficacy; shoulder; épaule

Year:  2019        PMID: 30787501      PMCID: PMC6373601          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2017-58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  33 in total

1.  Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura; N E Adams; J Beyer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1977-03

2.  3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire--psychometric properties and predictive validity.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Silje Endresen Reme; Steven J Linton; Yueng-Hsiang Huang; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Physical workload and risk of long-term sickness absence in the general working population and among blue-collar workers: prospective cohort study with register follow-up.

Authors:  Lars Louis Andersen; Nils Fallentin; Sannie Vester Thorsen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders.

Authors:  J M Lacker; A M Carosella; M Feuerstein
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-02

5.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Does physical or psychosocial workload modify the effect of musculoskeletal pain on sickness absence? A prospective study among the Finnish population.

Authors:  Subas Neupane; Tiina Pensola; Eija Haukka; Anneli Ojajärvi; Päivi Leino-Arjas
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Self-efficacy is associated with pain, functioning, and coping in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain.

Authors:  Heather Brister; Judith A Turner; Leslie A Aaron; Lloyd Mancl
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2006

8.  Effects of psychosocial and individual psychological factors on the onset of musculoskeletal pain: common and site-specific effects.

Authors:  E S Nahit; I M Hunt; M Lunt; G Dunn; A J Silman; G J Macfarlane
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness.

Authors:  Margaret P Staples; Andrew Forbes; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Associations Between the Readiness for Return to Work Scale and Return to Work: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Lene Aasdahl; Kristine Pape; Chris Jensen; Ottar Vasseljen; Tore Braathen; Roar Johnsen; Marius Steiro Fimland
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.