Literature DB >> 29372497

Expectations for Return to Work After Workplace Injuries: The Relationship Between Estimated Time to Return to Work and Estimate Accuracy.

Amanda Ellen Young1, Elyssa Besen2, Joanna Willetts3.   

Abstract

Purpose Worker's expectations for return to working have been found to relate to return-to-work (RTW) outcomes; however, it is unclear if this varies depending upon the expected time to RTW. To advance the understanding of the relationship between expectations and RTW, we set out to answer the following research questions: Are shorter estimated times to RTW more accurate than estimates that are longer of duration? In addition, we sought to determine if there was a point in time that coincides with RTW estimates no longer being reliably related to time to RTW. Methods We utilized workers' compensation data from a large, United States-based insurance company. Injured workers' (N = 15,221) expectations for returning to work were compared with the termination of their total temporary indemnity payments. A linear regression model was used to determine if shorter lengths of expected time to RTW were more accurate. Quantile regression modelling was used to determine if there was point at which the expected time to RTW no longer reliably relates to the actual time to RTW. Results Findings indicated a positive relationship such that as the number of expected days to RTW increased, the number of days of difference (estimate error) between the actual time to RTW and the expected time to RTW also increased (β = 0.34, P < .001). The results of the quantile regression modelling indicated that for all quantiles estimated, with the exception of the quantile for estimates of 360 days, the relationship between the actual time to RTW and the expected time to RTW were statistically significant (P < .05). However, for RTW estimates of more than 14 days the relationship began decreasing in strength. Conclusion Results indicate that injured workers' expectations for RTW can be used for RTW forecasting purposes. However, it is the case that RTW events in the near future can be forecasted with higher accuracy than those that are more distant, and that in general, injured workers will underestimate how long it will take them to RTW.

Keywords:  Case management; Return-to-work expectations; Worker’s compensation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372497     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9754-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  15 in total

1.  3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire--psychometric properties and predictive validity.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Silje Endresen Reme; Steven J Linton; Yueng-Hsiang Huang; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 2.  The importance, measurement and practical implications of worker's expectations for return to work.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; Elyssa Besen; YoonSun Choi
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M B Ferraz; M R Quaresma; L R Aquino; E Atra; P Tugwell; C H Goldsmith
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  When the wind goes out of the sail - declining recovery expectations in the first weeks of back pain.

Authors:  J K P Carstens; W S Shaw; K Boersma; S E Reme; G Pransky; S J Linton
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 5.  Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes.

Authors:  M V Mondloch; D C Cole; J W Frank
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Expectations about recovery from acute non-specific low back pain predict absence from usual work due to chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joannes M Hallegraeff; Wim P Krijnen; Cees P van der Schans; Mathieu H G de Greef
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 7.000

7.  Association between illness perceptions and return-to-work expectations in workers with common mental health symptoms.

Authors:  Camilla Løvvik; Simon Øverland; Mari Hysing; Elizabeth Broadbent; Silje E Reme
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

8.  Psychological predictors for return to work after a myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J G Maeland; O E Havik
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 9.  Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Ross A Iles; Megan Davidson; Nicholas F Taylor; Paul O'Halloran
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-06

10.  Do expectancies of return to work and Job satisfaction predict actual return to work in workers with long lasting LBP?

Authors:  Jon Opsahl; Hege R Eriksen; Torill H Tveito
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.