Literature DB >> 2002172

Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones.

R P Carlyon1.   

Abstract

A series of experiments measured the discrimination by human listeners of frequency-modulated complex tones which differed only in the coherence of frequency modulation (FM). For the coherently modulated tones all components were modulated by the same 5-Hz sinusoid, and by the same percentage of their starting frequencies, whereas for the incoherently modulated tones the modulation of one (target) component differed from that of the rest. When the 400-ms complex was composed of consecutive harmonics of a common fundamental, performance improved monotonically with increases in modulator delay, and was nearly perfect at the longest delays. When the complex was inharmonic, performance was near chance at all modular delays, both for component frequencies between 1500 and 2500 Hz, and for component frequencies between 400 and 800 Hz. It is argued that listeners detected incoherence in harmonic complexes by detecting the resulting mistuning of the target component. This conclusion was supported by the finding that listeners were usually at least as good at detecting a fixed mistuning of the center component of a harmonic complex as they were at detecting a modulator phase delay imposed on it. A final experiment, with a stimulus duration of 1 s and slower modulation rates, showed that listeners could detect incoherence for some inharmonic complexes. However, detection was worse than for harmonic complexes and was, it is argued, based on weak harmonicity cues. The results of all experiments point to the absence of an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of FM incoherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2002172     DOI: 10.1121/1.400468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; David Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ecological origins of perceptual grouping principles in the auditory system.

Authors:  Wiktor Młynarski; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cortical mechanisms for the segregation and representation of acoustic textures.

Authors:  Tobias Overath; Sukhbinder Kumar; Lauren Stewart; Katharina von Kriegstein; Rhodri Cusack; Adrian Rees; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Sara Popham; Dana Boebinger; Dan P W Ellis; Hideki Kawahara; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.