Literature DB >> 21199841

Social learning and human mate preferences: a potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction.

Anthony C Little1, Benedict C Jones, Lisa M Debruine, Christine A Caldwell.   

Abstract

Inspired by studies demonstrating mate-choice copying effects in non-human species, recent studies of attractiveness judgements suggest that social learning also influences human preferences. In the first part of our article, we review evidence for social learning effects on preferences in humans and other animals. In the second part, we present new empirical evidence that social learning not only influences the attractiveness of specific individuals, but can also generalize to judgements of previously unseen individuals possessing similar physical traits. The different conditions represent different populations and, once a preference arises in a population, social learning can lead to the spread of preferences within that population. In the final part of our article, we discuss the theoretical basis for, and possible impact of, biases in social learning whereby individuals may preferentially copy the choices of those with high status or better access to critical information about potential mates. Such biases could mean that the choices of a select few individuals carry the greatest weight, rapidly generating agreement in preferences within a population. Collectively, these issues suggest that social learning mechanisms encourage the spread of preferences for certain traits once they arise within a population and so may explain certain cross-cultural differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21199841      PMCID: PMC3013470          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  42 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

Authors:  J H Langlois; L Kalakanis; A J Rubenstein; A Larson; M Hallam; M Smoot
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission.

Authors:  J Henrich; F J. Gil-White
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.178

5.  The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Peter J B Hancock
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2002-11

6.  Differences between the sexes in direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  'Culture' in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  L A Dugatkin; J G Godin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1992-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape.

Authors:  A C Little; B C Jones; I S Penton-Voak; D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolutionary accounts of human behavioural diversity.

Authors:  Gillian R Brown; Thomas E Dickins; Rebecca Sear; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Why do the Karo Batak prefer women with big feet? Flexible mate preferences and the notion that one size fits all.

Authors:  Geoff Kushnick
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-09

4.  Social conformity persists at least one day in 6-year-old children.

Authors:  Sai Sun; Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Limited evidence of hierarchical encoding in the cheerleader effect.

Authors:  Daniel J Carragher; Nicole A Thomas; O Scott Gwinn; Mike E R Nicholls
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Cross-cultural perception of female facial appearance: A multi-ethnic and multi-centre study.

Authors:  Rainer Voegeli; Rotraut Schoop; Elodie Prestat-Marquis; Anthony V Rawlings; Todd K Shackelford; Bernhard Fink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sexual Conflict and Gender Gap Effects: Associations between Social Context and Sex on Rated Attractiveness and Economic Status.

Authors:  Amany Gouda-Vossos; Barnaby J Dixson; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Role of DLPFC in the Learning Process of Human Mate Copying.

Authors:  Jin-Ying Zhuang; Jiajia Xie; Die Hu; Mingxia Fan; Li Zheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-19

9.  Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning.

Authors:  Sally E Street; Thomas J H Morgan; Alex Thornton; Gillian R Brown; Kevin N Laland; Catharine P Cross
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Physical attractiveness and sex as modulatory factors of empathic brain responses to pain.

Authors:  Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Katarzyna Jednoróg; Artur Marchewka
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.617

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.