Literature DB >> 21190677

Antibody-unfolding and metastable-state binding in force spectroscopy and recognition imaging.

Parminder Kaur1, Alexander Fuhrmann, Robert Ros, Linda Obenauer Kutner, Lumelle A Schneeweis, Ryman Navoa, Kirby Steger, Lei Xie, Christopher Yonan, Ralph Abraham, Michael J Grace, Stuart Lindsay.   

Abstract

Force spectroscopy and recognition imaging are important techniques for characterizing and mapping molecular interactions. In both cases, an antibody is pulled away from its target in times that are much less than the normal residence time of the antibody on its target. The distribution of pulling lengths in force spectroscopy shows the development of additional peaks at high loading rates, indicating that part of the antibody frequently unfolds. This propensity to unfold is reversible, indicating that exposure to high loading rates induces a structural transition to a metastable state. Weakened interactions of the antibody in this metastable state could account for reduced specificity in recognition imaging where the loading rates are always high. The much weaker interaction between the partially unfolded antibody and target, while still specific (as shown by control experiments), results in unbinding on millisecond timescales, giving rise to rapid switching noise in the recognition images. At the lower loading rates used in force spectroscopy, we still find discrepancies between the binding kinetics determined by force spectroscopy and those determined by surface plasmon resonance-possibly a consequence of the short tethers used in recognition imaging. Recognition imaging is nonetheless a powerful tool for interpreting complex atomic force microscopy images, so long as specificity is calibrated in situ, and not inferred from equilibrium binding kinetics.
Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21190677      PMCID: PMC3010837          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  22 in total

1.  Single-molecule recognition imaging microscopy.

Authors:  C Stroh; H Wang; R Bash; B Ashcroft; J Nelson; H Gruber; D Lohr; S M Lindsay; P Hinterdorfer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Single-molecule force spectroscopy: a method for quantitative analysis of ligand-receptor interactions.

Authors:  Alexander Fuhrmann; Robert Ros
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.307

3.  Theoretical analysis of single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments: heterogeneity of chemical bonds.

Authors:  M Raible; M Evstigneev; F W Bartels; R Eckel; M Nguyen-Duong; R Merkel; R Ros; D Anselmetti; P Reimann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Simultaneous topography and recognition imaging: physical aspects and optimal imaging conditions.

Authors:  Johannes Preiner; Andreas Ebner; Lilia Chtcheglova; Rong Zhu; Peter Hinterdorfer
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.874

5.  Imaging glycosylation.

Authors:  Hongda Wang; Linda Obenauer-Kutner; Mei Lin; Yunping Huang; Michael J Grace; Stuart M Lindsay
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Quantitative analysis of single-molecule RNA-protein interaction.

Authors:  Alexander Fuhrmann; Jan C Schoening; Dario Anselmetti; Dorothee Staiger; Robert Ros
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Refined procedure of evaluating experimental single-molecule force spectroscopy data.

Authors:  Alexander Fuhrmann; Dario Anselmetti; Robert Ros; Sebastian Getfert; Peter Reimann
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2008-03-13

8.  Recognition imaging of acetylated chromatin using a DNA aptamer.

Authors:  Liyun Lin; Qiang Fu; Berea A R Williams; Abdelhamid M Azzaz; Michael A Shogren-Knaak; John C Chaput; Stuart Lindsay
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM.

Authors:  M Rief; M Gautel; F Oesterhelt; J M Fernandez; H E Gaub
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Detection and localization of individual antibody-antigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  P Hinterdorfer; W Baumgartner; H J Gruber; K Schilcher; H Schindler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Long lifetime of hydrogen-bonded DNA basepairs by force spectroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Fuhrmann; Sebastian Getfert; Qiang Fu; Peter Reimann; Stuart Lindsay; Robert Ros
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Improving single molecule force spectroscopy through automated real-time data collection and quantification of experimental conditions.

Authors:  Zackary N Scholl; Piotr E Marszalek
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Probing transient protein-mediated DNA linkages using nanoconfinement.

Authors:  Maedeh Roushan; Parminder Kaur; Alena Karpusenko; Preston J Countryman; Carlos P Ortiz; Shuang Fang Lim; Hong Wang; Robert Riehn
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Enhanced electrostatic force microscopy reveals higher-order DNA looping mediated by the telomeric protein TRF2.

Authors:  Parminder Kaur; Dong Wu; Jiangguo Lin; Preston Countryman; Kira C Bradford; Dorothy A Erie; Robert Riehn; Patricia L Opresko; Hong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Atomic Force Microscopy for Protein Detection and Their Physicoсhemical Characterization.

Authors:  Tatyana O Pleshakova; Natalia S Bukharina; Alexander I Archakov; Yuri D Ivanov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.