Literature DB >> 10334089

Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale?

J M Loomis1, J W Philbeck.   

Abstract

A number of studies have resulted in the finding of a 3-D perceptual anisotropy, whereby spatial intervals oriented in depth are perceived to be smaller than physically equal intervals in the frontoparallel plane. In this experiment, we examined whether this anisotropy is scale invariant. The stimuli were L shapes created by two rods placed flat on a level grassy field, with one rod defining a frontoparallel interval, and the other, a depth interval. Observers monocularly and binocularly viewed L shapes at two scales such that they were projectively equivalent under monocular viewing. Observers judged the aspect ratio (depth/width) of each shape. Judged aspect ratio indicated a perceptual anisotropy that was invariant with scale for monocular viewing, but not for binocular viewing. When perspective is kept constant, monocular viewing results in perceptual anisotropy that is invariant across these two scales and presumably across still larger scales. This scale invariance indicates that the perception of shape under these conditions is determined independently of the perception of size.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10334089     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  28 in total

1.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Depth compression based on mis-scaling of binocular disparity may contribute to angular expansion in perceived optical slant.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground?

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Perceived relative distance on the ground affected by the selection of depth information.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

6.  Environmental surfaces and the compression of perceived visual space.

Authors:  Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Differential intrinsic bias of the 3-D perceptual environment and its role in shape constancy.

Authors:  Antonio Aznar-Casanova; Matthias Sven Keil; Manuel Moreno; Hans Supèr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Space perception of strabismic observers in the real world environment.

Authors:  Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The social psychology of perception experiments: hills, backpacks, glucose, and the problem of generalizability.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Brennan Klein; Ariana Spiegel; Cassandra J Strawser; Morgan Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.