Literature DB >> 26594884

Large perceptual distortions of locomotor action space occur in ground-based coordinates: Angular expansion and the large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion.

Brennan J Klein1, Zhi Li1, Frank H Durgin1.   

Abstract

What is the natural reference frame for seeing large-scale spatial scenes in locomotor action space? Prior studies indicate an asymmetric angular expansion in perceived direction in large-scale environments: Angular elevation relative to the horizon is perceptually exaggerated by a factor of 1.5, whereas azimuthal direction is exaggerated by a factor of about 1.25. Here participants made angular and spatial judgments when upright or on their sides to dissociate egocentric from allocentric reference frames. In Experiment 1, it was found that body orientation did not affect the magnitude of the up-down exaggeration of direction, suggesting that the relevant orientation reference frame for this directional bias is allocentric rather than egocentric. In Experiment 2, the comparison of large-scale horizontal and vertical extents was somewhat affected by viewer orientation, but only to the extent necessitated by the classic (5%) horizontal-vertical illusion (HVI) that is known to be retinotopic. Large-scale vertical extents continued to appear much larger than horizontal ground extents when observers lay sideways. When the visual world was reoriented in Experiment 3, the bias remained tied to the ground-based allocentric reference frame. The allocentric HVI is quantitatively consistent with differential angular exaggerations previously measured for elevation and azimuth in locomotor space. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26594884      PMCID: PMC4792769          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  52 in total

1.  Not letting the left leg know what the right leg is doing: limb-specific locomotor adaptation to sensory-cue conflict.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Laura F Fox; Dong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

2.  Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space.

Authors:  John M Foley; Nilton P Ribeiro-Filho; José A Da Silva
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  An analysis of the vertical-horizontal illusion.

Authors:  T M KUNNAPAS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-02

4.  Exocentric pointing in depth.

Authors:  Jan J Koenderink; Andrea J van Doorn; Astrid M L Kappers; Michelle J A Doumen; James T Todd
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Horizontal and vertical distance perception: the discorded-orientation theory.

Authors:  A Higashiyama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

6.  Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion.

Authors:  L Armstrong; L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

7.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Angular scale expansion theory and the misperception of egocentric distance in locomotor space.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Psychol Neurosci       Date:  2014

9.  Exploring the edges of visual space: the influence of visual boundaries on peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Shradha Sanghvi; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Anchoring in action: manual estimates of slant are powerfully biased toward initial hand orientation and are correlated with verbal report.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Eric McManama; Charles Swank; Morgan Williams; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  A large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion produced with small objects separated in depth.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Perceived azimuth direction is exaggerated: Converging evidence from explicit and implicit measures.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Do Explicit Estimates of Angular Declination Become Ungrounded in the Presence of a Ground Plane?

Authors:  Umi Keezing; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-10-29

4.  Differential Angular Expansion in Perceived Direction in Azimuth and Elevation Are Yoked to the Presence of a Perceived Ground Plane.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Umi I Keezing
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-24

5.  Horizontal-vertical anisotropy with respect to bias and sensitivity.

Authors:  Stephen Dopkins; Darin Galyer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.