Literature DB >> 21188441

Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions.

A Jänes1, L Weisby, L A Israelsson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication after stoma formation. No consistent definition of parastomal hernia has been used in previous studies using clinical examination or computed tomography (CT) scan. The correlation between herniation rates found with clinical examination and CT scan has been poor. A definition of parastomal hernia with clinical examination that correlates with findings from CT scan should be sought.
METHODS: Parastomal hernia, was with surgeons' clinical examination, defined as any protrusion in the vicinity of the stoma with the patient straining in a supine and an erect position. A new CT scan method was developed with the patient examined in the prone position. Radiologists defined herniation as any intra-abdominal content protruding beyond the peritoneum or the presence of a hernia sac. The correlation between investigators and methods were estimated by calculating Fleiss' Kappa values.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were assessed by three surgeons and three radiologists. For the surgeons, the Kappa value was 0.85. For the radiologists, it was 0.85 with CT scan in the prone position and 0.82 in the supine position. For the surgeons and radiologists collectively, the Kappa value was 0.80 for CT scan in the prone position and 0.63 in the supine position.
CONCLUSION: With the new CT scan method examining patients in the prone position, the clinical and radiological definitions were highly reproducible and correlated strongly between methods and raters. With the strong correlation between clinical and radiological assessments, clinical examination alone is sufficient as follow-up. Conventional CT scan with the patient supine is not a reliable tool for diagnosing parastomal hernia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21188441     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0769-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  14 in total

1.  Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  K Marimuthu; C Vijayasekar; D Ghosh; G Mathew
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation.

Authors:  Ismail Gögenur; Janni Mortensen; Thomas Harvald; Jacob Rosenberg; Anders Fischer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation.

Authors:  Asim Cingi; Tebessum Cakir; Ali Sever; A Ozdemir Aktan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Parastomal hernia.

Authors:  P W G Carne; G M Robertson; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Prevention of parastomal hernia by the placement of a mesh at the primary operation.

Authors:  F Helgstrand; I Gögenur; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled phase 1 study.

Authors:  T M Hammond; A Huang; K Prosser; J N Frye; N S Williams
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia.

Authors:  A Jänes; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study.

Authors:  Arthur Jänes; Yucel Cengiz; Leif A Israelsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification.

Authors:  J Moreno-Matias; X Serra-Aracil; A Darnell-Martin; J Bombardo-Junca; L Mora-Lopez; M Alcantara-Moral; P Rebasa; I Ayguavives-Garnica; S Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Xavier Serra-Aracil; Jordi Bombardo-Junca; Juan Moreno-Matias; Anna Darnell; Laura Mora-Lopez; Manuel Alcantara-Moral; Isidro Ayguavives-Garnica; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sunil K Narang; Nasra N Alam; Nick J Campain; Samir Pathak; John S McGrath; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  M López-Cano; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; B Hansson; I Kyle-Leinhase; J G Alamino; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Rationale and Early Experience with Prophylactic Placement of Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia Formation after Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion and Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy F Donahue; Eugene K Cha; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; F Agresta; J M Garcia Alamino; D Berger; F Berrevoet; H-T Brandsma; K Bury; J Conze; D Cuccurullo; U A Dietz; R H Fortelny; C Frei-Lanter; B Hansson; F Helgstrand; A Hotouras; A Jänes; L F Kroese; J R Lambrecht; I Kyle-Leinhase; M López-Cano; L Maggiori; V Mandalà; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; M Prudhomme; T Rautio; N Smart; M Śmietański; M Szczepkowski; C Stabilini; F E Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial.

Authors:  H T Brandsma; B M E Hansson; T J Aufenacker; D van Geldere; F M van Lammeren; C Mahabier; P Steenvoorde; T S de Vries Reilingh; R J Wiezer; J H W de Wilt; R P Bleichrodt; C Rosman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Seung Chul Heo; Heung-Kwon Oh; Yoon Suk Song; Mi Sun Seo; Eun Kyung Choe; Seungbum Ryoo; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-08-31

7.  A comparison between intrastomal 3D ultrasonography, CT scanning and findings at surgery in patients with stomal complaints.

Authors:  P Näsvall; F Wikner; U Gunnarsson; J Rutegård; K Strigård
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Quality of life and hernia development 5 years after open abdomen treatment with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction.

Authors:  U Petersson; T Bjarnason; M Björck; A Montgomery; P Rogmark; M Svensson; K Sörelius; S Acosta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair.

Authors:  J Al Shakarchi; J G Williams
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Timothy F Donahue; Bernard H Bochner; John P Sfakianos; Matthew Kent; Melanie Bernstein; William M Hilton; Eugene K Cha; Alyssa M Yee; Guido Dalbagni; Hebert A Vargas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.