Literature DB >> 24384155

Risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy.

Timothy F Donahue1, Bernard H Bochner1, John P Sfakianos1, Matthew Kent2, Melanie Bernstein1, William M Hilton1, Eugene K Cha1, Alyssa M Yee1, Guido Dalbagni1, Hebert A Vargas3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication of stoma formation after radical cystectomy. We determined the prevalence and risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 433 consecutive patients who underwent open radical cystectomy and ileal conduit between 2006 and 2010. Postoperative cross-sectional imaging studies performed for routine oncologic followup (1,736) were evaluated for parastomal hernia, defined as radiographic evidence of protrusion of abdominal contents through the abdominal wall defect created by forming the stoma. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine clinical and surgical factors associated with parastomal hernia.
RESULTS: Complete data were available for 386 patients with radiographic parastomal hernia occurring in 136. The risk of a parastomal hernia developing was 27% (95% CI 22, 33) and 48% (95% CI 42, 55) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Clinical diagnosis of parastomal hernia was documented in 93 patients and 37 were symptomatic. Of 16 patients with clinical parastomal hernia referred for repair 8 had surgery. On multivariable analysis female gender (HR 2.25; 95% CI 1.58, 3.21; p<0.0001), higher body mass index (HR 1.08 per unit increase; 95% CI 1.05, 1.12; p<0.0001) and lower preoperative albumin (HR 0.43 per gm/dl; 95% CI 0.25, 0.75; p=0.003) were significantly associated with parastomal hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of radiographic evidence of parastomal hernia approached 50% at 2 years. Female gender, higher body mass index and lower preoperative albumin were most associated with the development of parastomal hernia. Identifying those at greatest risk may allow for prospective surgical maneuvers at the time of initial surgery, such as placement of prophylactic mesh in selected patients, to prevent the occurrence of parastomal hernia.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cystectomy; hernia; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24384155      PMCID: PMC4156556          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

1.  Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions.

Authors:  A Jänes; L Weisby; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  K Marimuthu; C Vijayasekar; D Ghosh; G Mathew
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 3.  Prognostic factors after surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: an overview.

Authors:  M Caricato; D Borzomati; F Ausania; S Valeri; A Rosignoli; R Coppola
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Small-gut obstructions following combined excision of the rectum with special reference to strangulation round the colostomy.

Authors:  J C GOLIGHER; O V LLOYD-DAVIES; C T ROBERTSON
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1951-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Parastomal hernia. A study of the French federation of ostomy patients.

Authors:  J Ripoche; C Basurko; P Fabbro-Perray; M Prudhomme
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.043

6.  A prospective audit of stomas--analysis of risk factors and complications and their management.

Authors:  P J Arumugam; L Bevan; L Macdonald; A J Watkins; A R Morgan; J Beynon; N D Carr
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia.

Authors:  A Jänes; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification.

Authors:  J Moreno-Matias; X Serra-Aracil; A Darnell-Martin; J Bombardo-Junca; L Mora-Lopez; M Alcantara-Moral; P Rebasa; I Ayguavives-Garnica; S Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Strangulated para-ileostomy hernia.

Authors:  A M Cuthbertson; J P Collins
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1977-02

10.  Computed tomography classification for parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Su Han Seo; Hee Jung Kim; Seung Yeop Oh; Jei Hee Lee; Kwang Wook Suh
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-08-03
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative and modifiable factors to lower postoperative complications after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Marie C Hupe; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sunil K Narang; Nasra N Alam; Nick J Campain; Samir Pathak; John S McGrath; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Rationale and Early Experience with Prophylactic Placement of Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia Formation after Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion and Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy F Donahue; Eugene K Cha; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Preoperative nutritional factors and outcomes after radical cystectomy: A narrative review.

Authors:  Janie Allaire; Tal Ben-Zvi; Benoît Lamarche; Karine Robitaille; Yves Fradet; Louis Lacombe; Vincent Fradet
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Selection of Bowel for Urinary Diversion and Choice of Diversion for Indian Patients.

Authors:  Ginil Kumar Pooleri; N Sivasankaran
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-10

7.  The impact of preoperative nutritional status on post-surgical complication and mortality rates in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Paola Irene Ornaghi; Luca Afferi; Alessandro Antonelli; Maria Angela Cerruto; Katia Odorizzi; Alessandra Gozzo; Livio Mordasini; Agostino Mattei; Philipp Baumeister; Julian Cornelius; Alessandro Tafuri; Marco Moschini
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The European Hernia Society classification applied to the rare cases of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective cohort of 96 patients.

Authors:  J S Su; N Y Hoy; A Fafaj; L Tastaldi; A Strong; M Rosen; J Li; H M Wood
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Evidence summary for nonsurgical prevention and management of parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy.

Authors:  Hong-Feng Xie; Man Feng; Song-Mei Cao; Ying-Ying Jia; Peng Gao; Shu-Hua Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 10.  Ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder: selection and contemporary patterns of use.

Authors:  Nima Almassi; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.