Literature DB >> 21980587

Surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia.

Seung Chul Heo1, Heung-Kwon Oh, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Eun Kyung Choe, Seungbum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia is a major complication of an intestinal stoma. This study was performed to compare the results of various operative methods to treat parastomal hernias.
METHODS: Results of surgical treatment for parastomal hernias (postoperative recurrence, complications and postoperative hospital stays) were surveyed in 39 patients over an 11-year period. The patients enrolled in this study underwent surgery by a single surgeon to exclude surgeon bias.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients were male, and twenty-two patients were female. The mean age was 65.9 years (range, 36 to 86 years). The stomas were 35 sigmoid-end-colostomies (90%), 2 loop-colostomies (5%), and 2 double-barrel-colostomies. Over half of the hernias developed within two years after initial formation. Stoma relocation was performed in 8 patients, suture repair in 14 patients and mesh repair in 17 patients. Seven patients had recurrence of the hernia, and ten patients suffered from complications. Postoperative complications and recurrence were more frequent in stoma relocation than in suture repair and mesh repair. Emergency operations were performed in four patients (10.3%) with higher incidence of complications but not with increased risk of recurrence. Excluding emergency operations, complications of relocations were not higher than those of mesh repairs. Postoperative hospital stays were shortest in mesh repair patients.
CONCLUSION: In this study, mesh repair showed low recurrence and a low complication rate with shorter hospital stay than relocation methods, though these differences were not statistically significant. Further studies, including randomized trials, are necessary if more reliable data on the surgical treatment of parastomal hernias are to be obtained.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Mesh repair; Parastomal hernia; Recurrence; Relocation

Year:  2011        PMID: 21980587      PMCID: PMC3180597          DOI: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol        ISSN: 2093-7822


  16 in total

1.  Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy.

Authors:  A P Leong; E E Londono-Schimmer; R K Phillips
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Parastomal hernia repair: modified thorlakson technique, reinforced by polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  P P Tekkis; H M Kocher; J G Payne
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Preventing and treating parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Leif A Israelsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities.

Authors:  Charles H C Pilgrim; Richard McIntyre; Michael Bailey
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Parastomal hernia.

Authors:  P W G Carne; G M Robertson; F A Frizelle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled phase 1 study.

Authors:  T M Hammond; A Huang; K Prosser; J N Frye; N S Williams
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study.

Authors:  Arthur Jänes; Yucel Cengiz; Leif A Israelsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy.

Authors:  E E Londono-Schimmer; A P Leong; R K Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia.

Authors:  Xavier Serra-Aracil; Jordi Bombardo-Junca; Juan Moreno-Matias; Anna Darnell; Laura Mora-Lopez; Manuel Alcantara-Moral; Isidro Ayguavives-Garnica; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Safety and outcome of use of nonabsorbable mesh for repair of fascial defects in the presence of open bowel.

Authors:  Daniel J Geisler; John C Reilly; Steven G Vaughan; Edward J Glennon; Philip D Kondylis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Correction of parastomal hernia using meshes].

Authors:  A Lampel; N Runkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Repair of complex parastomal hernias.

Authors:  G S Hwang; M H Hanna; J C Carmichael; S D Mills; A Pigazzi; M J Stamos
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair.

Authors:  J Al Shakarchi; J G Williams
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Andrew S Miller; Kathryn Boyce; Benjamin Box; Matthew D Clarke; Sarah E Duff; Niamh M Foley; Richard J Guy; Lisa H Massey; George Ramsay; Dominic A J Slade; James A Stephenson; Phil J Tozer; Danette Wright
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.917

5.  Analysis of risk factors for the development of incisional and parastomal hernias in patients after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  In Ho Song; Heon-Kyun Ha; Sang-Gi Choi; Byeong Geon Jeon; Min Jung Kim; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.