Literature DB >> 19011935

Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study.

Arthur Jänes1, Yucel Cengiz, Leif A Israelsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia is a major clinical problem. In a randomized, clinical trial, a prosthetic mesh in a sublay position at the index operation reduced the rate of parastomal hernia at 12-month follow-up, without any increase in the rate of complications. This study was designed to evaluate the rate of complications after 5 years.
METHODS: Between January 2001 and April 2003, 54 patients who had a permanent ostomy were randomized to a conventional stoma or to a stoma with the addition of a mesh in a sublay position. A large-pore, lightweight mesh with a reduced polypropylene content and a high proportion of absorbable material was used.
RESULTS: After 5 years, 21 patients with a conventional stoma were alive and parastomal herniation was recorded in 17 patients, of whom repair had been demanded in 5. In 15 patients operated on with the addition of a mesh herniation, that did not require repair, was present in 2 (P<0.001). No fistulas or strictures developed. No mesh infection was noted and no mesh was removed during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: At stoma formation, a prophylactic low-weight mesh in a sublay position is a safe procedure that reduces the rate of parastomal hernia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19011935     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9785-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position.

Authors:  R Kasperk; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Parastomal hernia.

Authors:  L Martin; G Foster
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  [Sugerbaker technique in para-colostomy hernia. An analysis of personal experiences].

Authors:  S Stelzner; G Hellmich; K Ludwig
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.942

4.  Colostomy: a new look at morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  B L Abrams; F H Alsikafi; N G Waterman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Late complications following operations for cancer of the rectum and anus.

Authors:  O Kronborg; J Kramhöft; O Backer; M Sprechler
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  [Living with a colostomy. A long-term follow-up investigation of 110 patients submitted to operation for cancer of the rectum].

Authors:  I Balslev
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1973-12-17

7.  Analysis of late stomal complications following ostomy surgery.

Authors:  J T Mäkelä; P H Turku; S T Laitinen
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1997

8.  Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia.

Authors:  A Jänes; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy.

Authors:  E E Londono-Schimmer; A P Leong; R K Phillips
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Early local complications from intestinal stomas.

Authors:  R K Pearl; M L Prasad; C P Orsay; H Abcarian; A B Tan; M T Melzl
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1985-10
View more
  71 in total

1.  Parastomal hernia repair outcomes in relation to stoma site with diisocyanate cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen mesh.

Authors:  N J Smart; R Velineni; D Khan; I R Daniels
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Searching for the best polypropylene mesh to be used in bowel contamination.

Authors:  A Díaz-Godoy; M A García-Ureña; J López-Monclús; V Vega Ruíz; D Melero Montes; N Erquinigo Agurto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  [Correction of parastomal hernia using meshes].

Authors:  A Lampel; N Runkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Parastomal hernia: clinical and radiological definitions.

Authors:  A Jänes; L Weisby; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  [Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia].

Authors:  D Berger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a five year follow up of a randomised study.

Authors:  Markus Schäfer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Preventing parastomal herniation: is prophylactic prosthetic mesh absolutely necessary?

Authors:  M D Evans; G L Williams; B M Stephenson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Preventing parastomal hernia with modified stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART) in patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  A E Canda; C Terzi; C Agalar; T Egeli; C Arslan; C Altay; F Obuz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  S V Patel; L Zhang; S A Chadi; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.