Literature DB >> 21187527

Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.

T Baccetti1, H J De Clerck, L H Cevidanes, L Franchi.   

Abstract

The aim of the present morphometric investigation was to evaluate the effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in the treatment of growing patients with Class III malocclusion. The shape and size changes in the craniofacial configuration of a sample of 26 children with Class III malocclusions consecutively treated with the BAMP protocol were compared with a matched sample of 15 children with untreated Class III malocclusions. All subjects in the two groups were at a prepubertal stage of skeletal development at time of first observation. Average duration of treatment was 14 months. Significant treatment-induced modifications involved both the maxilla and the mandible. The most evident deformation consisted of marked forward displacement of the maxillary complex with more moderate favourable effects in the mandible. Deformations in the vertical dimension were not detected. The significant deformations were associated with significant differences in size in the group treated with the BAMP protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21187527      PMCID: PMC3106282          DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report.

Authors:  S L Singer; P J Henry; I Rosenberg
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition.

Authors:  Muhieddin Alarashi; Lorenzo Franchi; Andrea Marinelli; Efisio Defraia
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Size and shape measurement in contemporary cephalometrics.

Authors:  Grant T McIntyre; Peter A Mossey
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Effects of early activator treatment in patients with class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis.

Authors:  C J Lux; J Rübel; J Starke; C Conradt; P A Stellzig; P G Komposch
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth.

Authors:  L Franchi; T Baccetti; J A McNamara
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.

Authors:  Hugo De Clerck; Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.

Authors:  Hugo J De Clerck; Marie A Cornelis; Lucia H Cevidanes; Gavin C Heymann; Camilla J F Tulloch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia.

Authors:  Ayhan Enacar; Bahadir Giray; Muge Pehlivanoglu; Haldun Iplikcioglu
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Maritzabel Gubler; Lucia Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  15 in total

1.  Bone condition of the maxillary zygomatic process prior to orthodontic anchorage plate fixation.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction.

Authors:  Hugo De Clerck; Tung Nguyen; Leonardo Koerich de Paula; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Sagittal skeletal correction using symphyseal miniplate anchorage systems : Success rates and complications.

Authors:  Seçil Çubuk; Burçak Kaya; Zahire Şahinoğlu; Ufuk Ateş; Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı; Sina Uçkan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 5.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): A review.

Authors:  Apoorva Kamath; Shetty Suhani Sudhakar; Greeshma Kannan; Kripal Rai; Athul Sb
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

6.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Compensation of skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth: Part 2: Skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue parameters in comparison with nonextraction Class III therapies.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Gaida; Henning Dathe
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 8.  Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Feng; Jianhua Li; Yu Li; Zhihe Zhao; Sen Zhao; Jue Wang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of the Balters bionator in growing Class II patients.

Authors:  Carina Ferlin Antunes; Renato Bigliazzi; Francisco Antonio Bertoz; Cristina Lúcia Feijó Ortolani; Lorenzo Franchi; Kurt Faltin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  Bone- and dentoalveolar-anchored dentofacial orthopedics for Class III malocclusion: new approaches, similar objectives? : a systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Morales-Fernández; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Rosa Maria Yañez-Vico; Asuncion Mendoza-Mendoza; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.