Literature DB >> 11302588

Effects of early activator treatment in patients with class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis.

C J Lux1, J Rübel, J Starke, C Conradt, P A Stellzig, P G Komposch.   

Abstract

The aim of the present longitudinal cephalometric study was to evaluate the dentofacial shape changes induced by activator treatment between 9.5 and 11.5 years in male Class II patients. For a rigorous morphometric analysis, a thin-plate spline analysis was performed to assess and visualize dental and skeletal craniofacial changes. Twenty male patients with a skeletal Class II malrelationship and increased overjet who had been treated at the University of Heidelberg with a modified Andresen-Häupl-type activator were compared with a control group of 15 untreated male subjects of the Belfast Growth Study. The shape changes for each group were visualized on thin-plate splines with one spline comprising all 13 landmarks to show all the craniofacial shape changes, including skeletal and dento-alveolar reactions, and a second spline based on 7 landmarks to visualize only the skeletal changes. In the activator group, the grid deformation of the total spline pointed to a strong activator-induced reduction of the overjet that was caused both by a tipping of the incisors and by a moderation of sagittal discrepancies, particularly a slight advancement of the mandible. In contrast with this, in the control group, only slight localized shape changes could be detected. Both in the 7- and 13-landmark configurations, the shape changes between the groups differed significantly at P < .001. In the present study, the morphometric approach of thin-plate spline analysis turned out to be a useful morphometric supplement to conventional cephalometrics because the complex patterns of shape change could be suggestively visualized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11302588     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0120:EOEATI>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  9 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.

Authors:  T Baccetti; H J De Clerck; L H Cevidanes; L Franchi
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Analysis and visualization of growth-related and treatment-induced craniofacial changes.

Authors:  J Rübel; J Starke
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Effects of two different removable functional appliances on depth of the posterior airway space : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Luisa Katharina Meißner; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes one year post-treatment in Twin Block and FORSUS FRD treated patients.

Authors:  Dinesh Chander Chaudhary; Prasanna Kumar; Mohit Sharma; Karan Nehra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-15

5.  Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular shape changes induced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion : A long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franchi; Chiara Pavoni; Kurt Faltin; Renato Bigliazzi; Francesca Gazzani; Paola Cozza
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study.

Authors:  J Kochel; P Meyer-Marcotty; E Witt; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of the Balters bionator in growing Class II patients.

Authors:  Carina Ferlin Antunes; Renato Bigliazzi; Francisco Antonio Bertoz; Cristina Lúcia Feijó Ortolani; Lorenzo Franchi; Kurt Faltin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  3D Comparison of Mandibular Response to Functional Appliances: Balters Bionator versus Sander Bite Jumping.

Authors:  Francesca Gazzani; Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Kurt Faltin; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza; Renato Bigliazzi; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Roberta Lione
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction.

Authors:  Zeinab Azamian; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.