Literature DB >> 10926436

Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report.

S L Singer1, P J Henry, I Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Branemark Implants were placed in the zygomatic buttresses of the maxilla in a 12-year and 1-month-old female patient with a Class III malocclusion caused by maxillary growth retardation secondary to repair of a unilateral cleft lip and palate defect. The implants were left to integrate for 6 months followed by placement of customized abutments that projected into the buccal sulcus. Elastic traction (400 g per side) was applied from a facemask to the implants at 30 degrees to the occlusal plane for 14 hours per day for 8 months (ages 12 years and 10 months to 13 years and 6 months). The maxilla moved downward and forward 4 mm rotating anteriorly as it was displaced. The change in the maxillary occlusal plane resulted in a secondary opening of the mandible. There was a 2 degrees increase in the SN-mandibular plane angle and an increase in nasion to menton distance of 9 mm. Clinically, this resulted in an increase in fullness of the infraorbital region and correction of the pretreatment mandibular prognathism. There was an increase in nasal prominence as the maxilla advanced. This contributed to the increase in facial convexity. The secondary dental change frequently seen in standard facemask therapy was avoided. The displacement of the maxilla was stable 1 year beyond cessation of facemask therapy. The patient's midface profile was improved by age of 13 years and 6 months. Details of the clinical procedure and treatment changes are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10926436     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0253:OIAAAT>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  23 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.

Authors:  T Baccetti; H J De Clerck; L H Cevidanes; L Franchi
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Assessing bone volume for orthodontic miniplate fixation below the maxillary frontal process.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.

Authors:  Hugo De Clerck; Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area in skeletal Class III growing patients: A computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Hyub-Soo Lee; Hang-Moon Choi; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-12-12

5.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  New approach of maxillary protraction using modified C-palatal plates in Class III patients.

Authors:  Yoon-Ah Kook; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Ki Beom Kim; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Dentofacial effects of two facemask therapies for maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Yuan Shu Ge; Jin Liu; Lin Chen; Jian Li Han; Xin Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 9.  Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Feng; Jianhua Li; Yu Li; Zhihe Zhao; Sen Zhao; Jue Wang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.